Talk:Sorghum/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 08:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: CosXZ (talk · contribs) 19:58, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

As part of the GARC, I shall review Cos ^{(X + Z)} 19:58, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Many thanks! Chiswick Chap (talk) 05:46, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Stable?

Other than a minor edit war that was 2 months ago, the article is pretty stable. Cos ^{(X + Z)} 19:58, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Noted. Chiswick Chap (talk) 05:49, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Non-reviewer comments

I was watching this article for a while but never went for the review. Just wanted to put in my 2 cents: The links "Disease resistance" under subheading Pests and diseases and "Commercial sorghum" under See also are circular redirects that go back to this article. The former goes to a deleted anchor ("Research"), the latter to the Cultivation section. Reconrabbit 01:29, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Fixed both. Chiswick Chap (talk) 05:49, 21 August 2024 (UTC)