User talk:CosXZ

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, CosXZ, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 17:06, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cecil Lake Road (September 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 17:11, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, CosXZ! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 17:11, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cecil Lake Road (September 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 17:51, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cecil Lake Road (September 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 17:43, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peterbilt 389 (September 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 17:06, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello![edit]

Heya! Firstly, thank you for your help with improving the 'pedia for the last couple months. I've taken a look at your vandalism reverts, and everything was looking totally good from what I've seen. It's quite heartening to hear that you'd also be interested in reviewing new pages!

I saw your proposition over at the village pump, and I can definitely see the mindset that you were coming from, in regards to extended-confirmed being the cut-off for reviewing. Hopefully you took some positives away from that, although a bunch of people were quick to add their own thoughts there. What I WILL say in regards to that suggestion, is that if you are interested in seriously getting "into the weeds" with page patrolling, a good start for this path would be potentially finding a mentor at WP:NPPSCHOOL that can help guide some of your early reviews. It's by no means a requirement per se, but going through the program is a good way to ease into making consistent, quality patrols, without the fear of having a bunch of editors hound over a mistake in real time.

Anyway, I guess my point is that reviewing new pages is a pretty important volunteer position. But, if you're interested in "taking the next step" into that area, it's very nice to hear! I'd potentially be willing to be a trainer for you later on, if that's something you'd like to do in the future. In any case though, thanks for your efforts so far! Utopes (talk / cont) 00:38, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fort St John Transit System (November 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 21:14, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fort St John Transit System (November 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 21:36, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase[edit]

Hey. Just so you know there's a bot, Cyberbot I, that automatically archives processed reports at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase every couple of hours. You don't need to do it manually. Sideswipe9th (talk) 20:34, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok allright CosXZ (talk) 20:35, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Cecil Lake Road[edit]

Information icon Hello, CosXZ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cecil Lake Road, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Peterbilt 389[edit]

Information icon Hello, CosXZ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Peterbilt 389, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:06, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured list statistics update[edit]

Hi, thanks for updating Wikipedia:Featured list statistics! How did you determine the number of lists? Petscan is giving me ~296,000, but it's frequently not working for that large of a category tree so if you have another method I'd rather switch to that! --PresN 01:58, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The 300,000 lists was a guess, you can change it to 296,000 CosXZ (talk) 02:24, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FYI[edit]

The GA code "football" covers all codes of football. – Teratix 14:53, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Teratix and CosXZ: FYI, there is an issue on the talkpage notification, as that doesn't recognise the parameter "football". A question has been raised to fix this here, but doesn't look to have actioned yet. At the moment, we can either have it in the correct GA nomination category "football" or we can have the article history template on the talkpage listing it under "sports", but not both. Hopefully someone will fix this soon, and add football into {{Article history}}. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:40, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ta. – Teratix 15:45, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cecil Lake Road[edit]

Hello, CosXZ. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cecil Lake Road".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:43, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Peterbilt 389[edit]

Hello, CosXZ. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Peterbilt 389".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]