Talk:Statue of George Washington (Portland, Oregon)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Statue of George Washington (Portland, Oregon) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Copyright status of statue
[edit]@Another Believer: Any idea on the copyright status of the statue, or who would know? I've got a couple of photos of it I could make available on Commons if they are OK, and I guess if not I could upload one on en-wiki on a non-free basis. Please ping me if you respond, I don't currently scan my en-wiki watchlist. - Jmabel | Talk 18:28, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
- Responded on talk page ---Another Believer (Talk) 19:26, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Source
[edit]---Another Believer (Talk) 16:06, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
- A fine article. I wiish every city had this sort of coverage. Carptrash (talk) 17:38, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Tense
[edit]Following recent vandalism, this article's text was changed to past tense throughout. Sure, we should say the statue was installed, but the statue still exists somewhere. I'm not sure the entire article should use past tense. @Randy Kryn: Agreed? ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:58, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
- Sounds right, because until the statue's owners or government authorities say that the statue will be permanently removed and not re-erected present tense still applies. Randy Kryn (talk) 19:57, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Another source
[edit]---Another Believer (Talk) 20:12, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
Sandy
[edit]---Another Believer (Talk) 14:46, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
"Arts board says statues toppled during Portland protests should not return to original sites"
[edit]---Another Believer (Talk) 14:22, 17 October 2021 (UTC)