Talk:Stoner Sloth
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stoner Sloth article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Categories:
|
![]() | This article was created or improved during WikiProject Cannabis' "420 Collaboration" in 2017. |
Sources
[edit]- http://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-35147121
- http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/australasia/australia-anti-cannabis-stoner-sloth-campaign-backfires-marijuana-advert-a6780311.html
- http://www.thecannabist.co/2015/12/18/stoner-sloth-video-weed-australia/45352/
- https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/why-stoner-sloth-is-the-worst-possible-way-to-stop-kids-from-getting-high
- http://hightimes.com/news/australias-stoner-sloth-campaign-backfires-under-relentless-scrutiny/
- https://www.rt.com/news/326592-aussie-stoner-sloth-fail/
- http://www.cnn.com/videos/world/2015/12/27/stoner-sloth-lights-up-internet-cnni-walker-pkg.cnn
- https://www.leafly.com/news/politics/australias-stoner-sloth-anti-cannabis-campaign-delights-instead-o
- http://fortune.com/2015/12/28/saatchi-defends-stoner-sloth-ads/
- http://www.businessinsider.com/nsw-government-stoner-sloth-ads-spark-criticism-and-memes-2015-12
- http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/entertainment/Aussie-anti-cannabis-PSA-backfires-due-to-hilarious-Stoner-Sloth.html
- http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/trending/everyones-laughing-about-australias-stoner-sloth-anti-drug-campaign
- http://metro.co.uk/2015/12/18/stoner-sloth-tells-australian-kids-to-stop-smoking-weed-its-hilarious-5573548/
- http://theweek.com/speedreads/596475/australias-antipot-stoner-sloth-campaign-big-success-say-firms-behind-widely-mocked-ads
---Another Believer (Talk) 22:02, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
Categories?
[edit]Are either of the following categories appropriate? Category:Drug rehabilitation and Category:History of drug control. ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:51, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- Probably not IMO. Too niche-y. Maybe if there was an Australia specific history category?? I dunno really. - Bri (talk) 23:57, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah, I don't think either of these categories are exactly right, but I was looking for something along the lines of drug prevention. ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:00, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
- This Is Your Brain on Drugs might provide a useful precedent. - Bri (talk) 01:40, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:50, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
- This Is Your Brain on Drugs might provide a useful precedent. - Bri (talk) 01:40, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah, I don't think either of these categories are exactly right, but I was looking for something along the lines of drug prevention. ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:00, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Stub-Class Cannabis articles
- Low-importance Cannabis articles
- WikiProject Cannabis articles
- Stub-Class Marketing & Advertising articles
- Low-importance Marketing & Advertising articles
- WikiProject Marketing & Advertising articles
- Articles created or improved during 420 Collaboration 2017