Jump to content

Talk:Strike Back: Project Dawn/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Strike Back: Project Dawn/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TonyTheTiger (talk · contribs) 01:31, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

    • There are only two Strike Back related pages, this one, and the the previous series. I don't think that two pages is worth a navbox. -- Matthew RD 17:48, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
    • When the article for the next series is created a navbox might be considered along with a list of episodes and a list of characters as well as a franchis page.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:13, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
WP:LEAD
  • Done. -- Matthew RD 19:19, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Series overview
  • I have never seen this series. I am unable to tell if they find Latif or Porter, if their unit endures casualties, if they find WMDs, if the series ends in a cliffhanger, etc. The overview in general leaves me wondering a lot and probably does not summarize the important details of the series.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:53, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
Cast and characters
  • Done. -- Matthew RD 19:19, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
What? "However, the only cast member to return from the original series was Richard Armitage in the first episode. " If my english is good, this sentence is not correct. Richard Armitage is not the only member to return, since the two main characters are still the same. Luckyboy1965 (talk) 01:42, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Critical reactions
  • Done. -- Matthew RD 19:19, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
  • I'm not sure what you mean on this one. Could you elaborate? -- Matthew RD 17:48, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Done. -- Matthew RD 19:19, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Episodes
  1. "find the second" - what was the first; demanding->demand
  2. turns out to a woman->turns out to be a woman; was to be planted->were to be planted; is being escorted->is escorted
  3. first sentence quite run-on
  4. O.K.
  5. O.K.
  6. their vehicle breaks down and are forced->their vehicle breaks down, and they are forced
  7. his cousin, Rana from->his cousin, Rana, from
  8. O.K.
  9. O.K.
  10. Section base and they->Section base, and they--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Done fixes on the episodes section. -- Matthew RD 19:19, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
I am placing this article on hold. The concerns should be relatively easy to address within the next 7 days when I will reassess the article.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:29, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Well done. I am Passing this article right now.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 20:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Colour contrast problems

It seems that this article is using colours in the infobox which don't satisfy Wikipedia's accessibility guidelines. The contrast between the foreground colour and the background colour is low, which means that it may be difficult or impossible for people with visual impairments to read it.

To correct this problem, a group of editors have decided to remove support for invalid colours from Template:Infobox television season and other television season templates after 1 September 2015. If you would still like to use custom colours for the infobox and episode list in this article after that date, please ensure that the colours meet the WCAG AAA standard.

To test whether a colour combination is AAA-compliant you can use Snook's colour contrast tool. If your background colour is dark, then please test it against a foreground colour of "FFFFFF" (white). If it is light, please test it against a foreground colour of "000000" (black). The tool needs to say "YES" in the box for "WCAG 2 AAA Compliant" when you input the foreground and the background colour. You can generally make your colour compliant by adjusting the "Value (%)" fader in the middle box.

Please be sure to change the invalid colour in every place that it appears, including the infobox, the episode list, and the series overview table. If you have any questions about this, please ask on Template talk:Infobox television season. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Strike Back: Project Dawn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:00, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Strike_Back:_Project_Dawn/Archive_1&oldid=1018205065"