This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because it pull material from multiple sources and cites them-- it seems the bot may have picked up on titles and books which seemed similar to cited material. Kylearcher (talk) 15:42, 12 April 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kylearcher (talk • contribs) [reply]
To reviewing admin: I agree with the OP. Looking at the copyvios report, this looks like a false positive. --Drm310🍁 (talk) 15:41, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Drm310, for what it's worth it was a copyvio but the OP refactored the content. Primefac (talk) 17:21, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
