Talk:Telmatosaurus

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Renaming Questions[edit]

I added information to reflect B. Creisler's list at Dinosauria Online, but I still have two questions:

1) What was Marsh's original (1872) creature?

2) How does Hecatasaurus Brown, 1910 fit in? Did Brown not know of Nopsca's 1903 renaming, and just do so himself?

-- CFLeon (talk) 07:40, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like Limnosaurus is a junior synonym of Pristichampsus. Interestingly, Limnosaurus itself was a new genus name for Crocodilus ziphodon Marsh 1871. Not sure about #2, but it wouldn't be too shocking for Brown not to have known about Nopcsa's replacement name back in those days, as they were writing on different continents and presumably different languages. I hadn't heard of Hecatasaurus before now, too bad, pretty cool name! MMartyniuk (talk) 08:51, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, Barnum was apparently unaware of Nopcsa's 1903 article — even though it seems to have been written in English! The incomparably better information flow of our century doesn't prevent similar mistakes: see e.g. what happened with Nedoceratops.--MWAK (talk) 06:34, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]