Talk:The Complete On the Corner Sessions

Jazz Low‑importance

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Pretty unacceptable[edit]

This sounds like a press release, for the most part. I'm being completely serious. I'll do what I can, but believe me, this page may need to be completely reconstructed. TarkovskyFanX957 (talk) 23:21, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated presentation[edit]

The overall presentation of the article is outdated and nonsensical at times.

The tracks are listed by their irrelevant recording dates and only mention their first commercial release in the legend section, as afterthoughts (which contrats with the presentation of the “Complete In A Silent Way / Bitches Brew Sessions” articles). The “Notes” subsection has to be included with the “Track listing” one.

Compared to the “Dark Magus” and “Agharta”, there is few valuable info for the Content subsection. Except for “What They Do”, “Hip-Skip” and “Minnie”, all the other tracks are glossed over. The recording process of “On The Corner and “Get Up With It” should be evoked in details. It isn’t also explained why “Ife” is the only track from “Big Fun” that is included on the box-set.

The various “Performers” subsections should be deleted and instead be replaced by a single list that would rank them by song and recording date, in order to avoid confusion.

Last February, there was an edit done by an Anonymous user, and despite the misspells and wrong use of grammar, it did a better job at organising the article than what the bot does. Nu-Protocole (talk) 17:07, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]