Jump to content

Talk:The Kentucky Headhunters

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleThe Kentucky Headhunters has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 21, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
July 17, 2009Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

Automated peer review (updated)

[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
  • If there is not a free use image in the top right corner of the article, please try to find and include one.[?]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, if January 15, 2006 appeared in the article, link it as January 15, 2006.[?]

*As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), please do not link words in headings.[?] Done.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Arch O. La Grigory Deepdelver 18:11, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Itchy.jpg

[edit]

Image:Itchy.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have completed the fair use rationale and, unless there are further concerns, await the removal of the disputed tag. Arch O. La Grigory Deepdelver 18:02, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Which has happened. :) Arch O. La Grigory Deepdelver 16:12, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Black Stone Cherry

[edit]

One of the members of the metal band Black Stone Cherry is the son of one of the Kentucky Headhunters as of which I'm not sure (the gutiarist I believe.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Riseabovethis (talkcontribs) 03:53, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:The Kentucky Headhunters/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hello TPH and other editors. I'll be reviewing this article. I should have the GA checklist along with my analysis posted by tomorrow if not earlier. Timmeh 00:48, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist and analysis

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Surprisingly, there was little in the way of grammar and spelling issues compared to other GANs I've reviewed. However, I did come across some awkward sounding sentences and reworded them appropriately.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    As far as I can tell, the sources look good, and there is no original research, except for this: "Kenney left the band shortly after Flying Under the Radar, and Doug took over on bass guitar." You'll need to cite a source for that statement.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    The lead should include a sentence or two about the band's musical style, basically a short summary of what's in the relevant section of the article. Also, the first sentence should mention the Grammy win, so as to assert the band's notability right in the beginning.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    I know this isn't an immensely popular band, but did its music or members receive any notable criticism?
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    I'll put the article on hold until my concerns are addressed. Timmeh 23:48, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm passing the article, as it looks good now. Good work, congratulations, and good luck in your future work. :) Timmeh 17:46, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Other comments

[edit]
  • As for the fact that Kenney has left, the only source I found to verify it was a link on Associated Content, which is a blacklisted site. I think the fact that the band's website acknowledges Doug as bass guitarist is the best we can do now. The best critical receptions I could find were album reviews from various sites (Entertainment Weekly, Allmusic, Country Standard Time, Billboard). Allmusic says that they had a "legacy" but doesn't specify on that point. Also, I was told not to use "X-award winning" in lead sentences. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many ottersOne batOne hammer) 18:48, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • I found a source stating that Kenney left, but it doesn't give an exact date, only saying "recently" in a story published in August 2008. You might want to add that and reword the sentence to fit around it. Also, who told you not to use such a phrase in lead sentences? According to WP:LEAD, the first sentence is supposed to establish the subject's notability, and stating the fact that the band won a Grammy award does just that. Timmeh 19:05, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Singular vs Plural

[edit]

Someone wrote "The Kentucky Headhunters is", etc, throughout the article, arguing that "because they are an American band, it is singular". As this only applies to bands with non-plural names (e.g. ZZ Top), I have corrected the article to use the plural. Whoever made these changes is unaware of the collective singular versus plural rule in American English, and simply assumes that every band name is singular. Please prevent this from happening again. Thank you. AmericanLeMans (talk) 19:42, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Kentucky Headhunters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:42, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Kentucky Headhunters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:07, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Kentucky Headhunters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:32, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Kentucky Headhunters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:19, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]