Talk:The Standard Life Assurance Company (1825-2017)

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation

	This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This redirect was accepted from this draft on 18 June 2020 by reviewer Timtrent (talk · contribs).

Companies

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Neutrality[edit]

Hi - This article, as well as relying on one source, does not cover the serious controversies that surrounded the company in the early 21st century. There is nothing on Michael Hogan, nothing on Trevor Matthews' comments, nothing on the huge pay rises that Crombie and Co received. All this needs fleshing out. But please see my comments at Talk:Standard Life Aberdeen. Dormskirk (talk) 18:30, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure that it is lack of neutrality. Rather it is an article that needs expansion and development, surely? Fiddle Faddle 19:04, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Possibility; but that would duplicate the material in the article on Standard Life Aberdeen - that article deals with the controversies of the early 21st century much better. The solution may be to merge the two articles. I have opened a discussion on that at Talk:Standard Life Aberdeen. Dormskirk (talk) 19:52, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merging might be a useful approach. I have no horse in this race, I just accepted it at AFC Fiddle Faddle 20:01, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]