Talk:Vigilante rap

	Music portal Vigilante rap is within the scope of the Music genres task force of the Music project, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardize music genre articles on Wikipedia. Please visit the task force guidelines page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us assess and improve genre articles to good article status.Music/Music genres task forceWikipedia:WikiProject Music/Music genres task forceTemplate:WikiProject Music/Music genres task forcemusic genre articles
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Hip hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brazil Low‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Note[edit]

As a social phenomenon, the notability of this article lies only on the musical style itself. Since "vigilante rap" is mainly underground, there are no notable singers or songwriters in this kind of music.

The notability lies only on the social context and cultural meaning of a musical style created to be the opposite of the Brazilian gangsta rap, reflecting the societal changes that Rio de Janeiro are suffering nowadays. --Homem de Letras (talk) 14:03, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of Reference template removed[edit]

I think the article got enough of references and the template could not be needed from now on. If I'm wrong, tell me. Thanx. --Δ Mr. Nighttime Δ (talk) 13:31, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]