Talk:Welcome to the Canteen

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Progressive Rock Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

For some reason the album was originally released without the name "Traffic" anywhere on it; instead it was credited to the seven individual musicians.

I'd have to assume that music is a business, and that the name Traffic carries contractural elements to it that they didn't want or intend, particularly with Dave Mason involved, and doing two of his solo tunes. But then again, I don't know if this counted toward any obligations under any contracts to record companies. Perhaps it did count for that record company purposes, but they didn't want to have any other entanglements, so it was marketed without the Traffic name or logo, but the record company was happy just have something to put out.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.73.52.194 (talk • contribs) . ~~==Fair use rationale for Image:Traffic-Welcome to the Canteen (album cover).jpg==~~

Image:Traffic-Welcome to the Canteen (album cover).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:49, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
~~Fair use rationale for Image:Traffic-Welcome to the Canteen (album cover).jpg[edit]~~

Image:Traffic-Welcome to the Canteen (album cover).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

~~BetacommandBot 05:19, 14 July 2007 (UTC)~~[reply]
Exists. --Cdl obelix (talk) 12:43, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Welcome to the Canteen/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

Article requirements for:

Y Start-Class criteria:
(1)A reasonably complete infobox. (2) A lead section giving an overview of the album. (3) A track listing. (4) Reference to at least primary personnel by name. (5) Categorization at least by artist and year.

C-Class criteria:
(1) All of Start class criteria. (2) A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art. (3) At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section). (4) A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs. (5) A personnel section listing performers, including guest musicians. (6) A casual reader should learn something about the album.

B-Class criteria:
(1) All of B-Class criteria. (2) A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details. (3) A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians. (4) No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources. (5) No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow the style guidelines. (6) No glaring omissions of information (see some suggestions at WP:ALBUM) or extraneous information, like trivia.

--Cdl obelix (talk) 17:27, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 17:27, 11 September 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 10:21, 30 April 2016 (UTC)