This article was nominated for deletion on 7 April 2016. The result of the discussion was no consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Tagged the page since Bloomberg is the only ref with any mention of Redford. Separately, Bloomberg here is a profile and not RS. Search didn't turn up any news articles on Redford. Jppcap (talk) 22:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Following up on prev. edit.. the relationship I'm seeing with Redford on cut sentences pertains to company and synthesis. Jppcap (talk) 22:33, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Based on version post AfD: 3/7 new references added during AfD have subject's name in the title. One is a link to a court case (WP:Unreliable). 5/7 others appear to be subscription-based press releases (not independent of the subject). I'm removing the Businessweek company profile (previously removed) that is not reliable, as noted above. Alliance News is the only semi-reliable source (it does not contain subject's name in the title). Subject name is included in one sentence that says he was appointed non-executive director.
The useful sources that could meet GNG here are #6 and #8, which are using WP:OR to include subject.
0/12 sources discuss the subject in detail to indicate significant coverage. Will address when I have more time. Jppcap (talk) 01:34, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't true. Please try to respect the result of the AFD without resorting to trying to gradually degrade the article by removing sources. I added back the Bloomberg Businessweek reference as although now dead, it was the source of the information in the article. Philafrenzy (talk) 05:42, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
