Talk:Young fogey

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Page merge[edit]

Oppose - This page is a solid one about a topic that, though referencing old fogeys, and undeniably analogous to them, is different enough to qualify for an article in its own right.

Speedy Merge - no need to have this seperate to old fogeys. --Jum4 20:05, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - This appears to be yet another British subculture, not a variant of "old fogey" Mjk2357 19:15, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - I concur with the uppermost, unsigned comment.GSTQ 00:03, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Oppose - I also concur with the uppermost, unsigned comment.


Oppose - it is a significant cultural movement worthy of its own entry (for the record, I utterly disagree with the conclusion of the Spectator article linked to, but just because I disagree with things doesn't mean I don't want them linked to from Wikipedia). RobinCarmody, 21:33, 29 October 2006 (GMT)

Grammar[edit]

For a page about writers, there seem to be a lot of grammar issues. Fixing. ~ Wakanda's Black Panther! (contribs) 07:04, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trinity[edit]

I cannot say that Trinity College, Cambridge, as a great supply of people as you describe; certainly, I've never seen an undergrad/grad with a pipe, wearing tweed suits, and riding a bicycle is ubiquitous to the area. --Wee Jimmy (talk) 18:23, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, of course most of them go to Oxford, if they are able; one naturally finds fewer of those with such a taste for tradition among new universities. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.1.150.29 (talk) 01:03, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]