Talk:ZIS-101

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Soviet Union Low‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Automatic transmission??????

The statement that the 1936 ZIS 101 was equipped with a "three-speed automatic gearbox and a torque converter" CANNOT be correct. The first fully-automatic transmission was the Hydramatic on the 1939 Oldsmobile in the USA. The torque converter did not come into automotive use until the late 1940's. RogerInPDX (talk) 03:24, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

^He's right, Oldsmobile created the first automatic. Where'd the data for this article come from? --76.115.67.114 (talk) 10:02, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic transmission hoax

About the ZIS-101automatic transmission that was an crazy ruskie imbeciles propaganda,I had just fixed that shit. Neverguesswhathappened (talk) 22:31, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey dude Ive been watching you. The existence of "crazy ruskie imbeciles propaganda" does not entitle you to write crazy imbeciles propaganda on old cars, like stating that the UAZ Bukhanka was (is) an "unlicenced copy" of a Jeep FC150 when it actually came to be BEFORE and in essence is a GAZ-69 with forward control van body.. Or removing information on who constructed the Pobeda, just to mention a couple of concreted examples. Not many Russian cars or parts thereof are actual copies of anything else, if a similar design makes anything a copy then many western cars and parts thereof can be said to be copies of one another too. I dont know what your agenda is but vandalizing Wiki pages to make old Russian car manufacturers look bad must be like something of the dumbest approach ive ever seen. Do you realize how much work it will be to revert all of your vandalism? Please stop or I will do all I can to have you removed from Wikipedia. No, im not pro-Russian, I dont even have ANY political preferances, like the king of my country Norway. Im telling you this because any encyclopædia should contain the TRUTH, not crazy imbecile sneak propaganda of any kind. Even if its only about old cars. Now please remove your shit.

Rolling Phantom (talk) 13:28, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Zis1018.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 14:21, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]