User talk:Neverguesswhathappened

Welcome!

Hello, Neverguesswhathappened, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! --Muzammil (talk) 19:09, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey you

Hey dude Ive been watching you. The existence of "crazy ruskie imbeciles propaganda" does not entitle you to write crazy imbeciles propaganda on old cars, like stating that the UAZ Bukhanka was (is) an "unlicenced copy" of a Jeep FC150 when it actually came to be BEFORE and in essence is a GAZ-69 with forward control van body.. Or removing information on who constructed the Pobeda, just to mention a couple of concreted examples. Not many Russian cars or parts thereof are actual copies of anything else, if a similar design makes anything a copy then many western cars and parts thereof can be said to be copies of one another too. I dont know what your agenda is but vandalizing Wiki pages to make old Russian car manufacturers look bad must be like something of the dumbest approach ive ever seen. Do you realize how much work it will be to revert all of your vandalism? Please stop or I will do all I can to have you removed from Wikipedia. No, im not pro-Russian, I dont even have ANY political preferances, like the king of my country Norway. Im telling you this because any encyclopædia should contain the TRUTH, not crazy imbecile sneak propaganda of any kind. Even if its only about old cars. Now please remove your shit.

Rolling Phantom (talk) 13:32, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maintenance templates

Please do not remove maintenance templates without addressing the issues to which the templates refer. I refer especially to the templates removed in these edits:

Also, please do not change field names in infoboxes, as the infobox will not display any information given under a field name it does not recognize.

Finally, as a general rule, one should put at least one space between the full stop (period mark) at the end of a sentence and the word beginning the next sentence.

Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 11:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ZIS-150, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ZIL and ZiS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic edits

Your edits are problematic in at least a dozen ways. You break templates, break wikilinks, break external links, falsify content from existing sources. Please read some of the new user guides listed above, and start off in an easier manner. Your punctuation is also horrid. Please begin to approach Wikipedia as a more collaborative effort, and please take care in the future. Best regards, Mr.choppers | ✎ 03:09, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh good, I just found out that you're a sockpuppet of User:Eraseroftheevilshit. I will see you blocked in a day or two. Please don't come back. Mr.choppers | ✎ 03:22, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for vandalism and personal attacks. I also strongly advise you not to continue to post unsubstantiated personal opinions in articles when the block expires, as continuing to do so may well lead to an indefinite block. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:41, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Eraseroftheevilshit (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mike V • Talk 16:20, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]