Talk:Zhu Zhenheng

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 01:00, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Kingoflettuce (talk). Self-nominated at 20:23, 20 December 2022 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article new and long enough, well-referenced. Can't access the source in question so I will AGF. No copyvio, QPQ done. Good to go. Juxlos (talk) 03:19, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Courtesy name Dax"[edit]

The first sentence in the current version specifies his name as "Zhu Zhenheng (Chinese: 朱震亨; pinyin: Zhū Zhènhēng; 1282–1358),[1] courtesy name Dax (Chinese: 丹溪; pinyin: Dāx)...". I'm puzzled by this rendering: "Dax" doesn't look like pinyin-romanized Mandarin; it looks like it's pronounced [daks], with a distinctly non-Chinese syllable, and a reading like [daɕ] would still have a non-Mandarin final in the syllable. Looking up the characters on Wiktionary, the pronunciation of 丹溪 would instead be pinyin: Dānxī, Mandarin pronunciation: [tän⁵⁵ɕi⁵⁵] (maybe with tone sandhi or something, I don't actually speak Chinese).

So, what happened here? Does the name actually have such a weird (for Mandarin) syllable in it? Or is this a case of where the name in Western sources is quite different from the name as pronounced in Chinese (cf. Confucius, pinyin: Kǒng Fūzǐ)? In that case, shouldn't the pinyin rendering of 丹溪 follow the Chinese pronunciation of those characters, rather than a western pronunciation? oatco (talk) 15:36, 12 January 2023 (UTC) oatco (talk) 15:36, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

oatco "what happened here" = silly vandalism, plain and simple... KINGofLETTUCE 👑 🥬 18:58, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Heh, makes sense. Should've checked history, whoops ;) oatco (talk) 22:20, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ Simonis 2015, p. 55.