Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Łukasz Cieślewicz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 03:41, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Łukasz Cieślewicz

[edit]

Created by Hansi667 (talk). Self-nominated at 14:09, 3 December 2015 (UTC).

  • * Review Good to go! New article, timely nominated. Meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular: is neutral; cites sources with inline citations. DYK nomination was timely and article is easily long enough. Every paragraph is cited. No copyright violations or too close paraphrasing. Earwig's copy violation detector: Łukasz Cieślewicz report gives it a clean bill. I cannot read Danish, Faroese or Polish, and most of the citations are in those three languages. I WP:AGF. Hook is hooky enough, I think, and relates directly to the essence of the article. It is interesting, decently neutral, and appropriately cited. QPQ done. To my eye and without being able to read all the sources, this article was meticulously written and cited. Good job! 7&6=thirteen () 20:10, 31 December 2015 (UTC)