Template:Did you know nominations/Antipsychotic switching

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Gatoclass (talk) 08:09, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Antipsychotic switching

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that there are multiple ways to switch antipsychotics? Source: "There are principally four strategies when switching antipsychotic treatment...Correll subdivides these switching strategies into further groups...so that altogether eight different switching strategies are available." (DOI 10.1007/s40263-013-0079-5)
  • ALT1:... that switching antipsychotics can cause a supersensitivity psychosis? Source: "After an abrupt discontinuation of dopamine antagonists, a rebound psychosis might develop due to the up-regulation of receptors through a higher sensitivity for the physiologically released dopamine—based on this assumption also called supersensitivity psychosis..." (DOI 10.1007/s40263-013-0079-5)

• Reviewed: Neil Swallow

Moved to mainspace by Biochemistry&Love (talk). Self-nominated at 02:04, 28 April 2018 (UTC).

• Reviewing. New enough, long enough, very interesting and will take a little time to complete review. Whispyhistory (talk) 12:15, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

• General eligibility:

• New enough:
• Long enough:
• Other problems:

Policy compliance:

• Adequate sourcing:
• Neutral:
• Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
• Other problems:

Hook eligibility:

• Cited:
• Interesting:
• Other problems:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Important article, you have made it simple to understand. Main source written by people with possible COI- i.e. work for major pharmaceutical companies. In spite of that, reputable and neutral. I prefer proposed hook. Copyvio 2%, all else straightforward. There is only one category...could have more?? I actually look forward to seeing which articles you create..an amazing asset to Wikipedia. Thank you. Whispyhistory (talk) 12:54, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

• I sincerely appreciate the review, Whispyhistory! Thank you for pointing out the categorization; I've found an addition category and added it to the article. Many thanks for your kind words.―Biochemistry🙴❤ 13:48, 7 May 2018 (UTC)