Template:Did you know nominations/CGR 1st Class 2-6-0 1891

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 12:13, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

CGR 1st Class 2-6-0 1891[edit]

CGR 1st Class 2-6-0 1891

  • Comment: Not a self nomination

Created by Andre Kritzinger (talk). Nominated by Matty.007 (talk) at 16:38, 23 October 2013 (UTC).

  • QPQ missing. To nominator: please review another article before we go any further. Thanks, Poeticbent talk 05:37, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Hi Poeticbent, QPQ is not needed for non self nominations. I asked Crisco here. Thanks, Matty.007 09:00, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Alright, let's rehash this thing again. Review requirement #5 (quote): "New nominators (those with fewer than five DYK credits) are exempt from this review requirement..." But you are not a "new nominator" User:Matty.007. Don't place the QPQ burden on the creator who probably didn't ask for your nom to start with. "Your nomination" (i.e. the nomination) of another editor's article is not exempt, because you have more than 5 credits. Poeticbent talk 10:03, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
  • It also says "Reviewing another editor's nomination is part of the nomination process for self-nominations", and "New nominators (those with fewer than five DYK credits) are exempt from this review requirement, as is the nomination of another editor's article" seem to be saying that nominations of other editors work do not require QPQ. Matty.007 11:18, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
  • New reviewer needed; QPQ is *not* required. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:07, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
  • This article is new enough and long enough and is ready to steam off. The image is in the public domain and the hook is sourced. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the review. Matty.007 18:00, 15 November 2013 (UTC)