Template:Did you know nominations/Dark Archives

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:45, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Dark Archives

  • ... that Dark Archives reveals most books bound in human skin were made by respected doctors? Source: Rosenbloom, Megan. "Under Glass". Dark Archives: A Librarian's Investigation Into the Science and History of Books Bound in Human Skin. New York, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. pp. 3–6. ISBN 978-0-374-13470-9. for direct cite in article; Jacobson, Christine (30 March 2021). "A Look at Anthropodermic Bibliopegy: On Megan Rosenbloom's "Dark Archives"". Los Angeles Review of Books. Retrieved 14 January 2022. for secondary-source discussion of a specific case

Moved to mainspace by Vaticidalprophet (talk). Self-nominated at 14:45, 8 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Dark Archives; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

  • Reviewing... Moved to mainspace within 7-days of nomination, long enough, reads very well, QPQ provided, hook is interesting and in article. Will complete rest soon. Thank you Vaticidalprophet. Whispyhistory (talk) 06:02, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
  • ... Hook in article followed by citation to the book itself. AGF on its content. Copyvio detects copy of quotes and names (not a problem). Whispyhistory (talk) 05:27, 10 July 2023 (UTC)