Template:Did you know nominations/Get Him Back! (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 17:35, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Get Him Back!
- ... that Olivia Rodrigo's song "Get Him Back!" is about a romance that began during the summer and had concluded by spring? Source: Elle
- ALT1: ... that Olivia Rodrigo was inspired to write "Get Him Back!" after getting into ill-advised relationships due to people's expectations? Source: Elle
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/A Friend of the Family (TV series)
- Comment: if the first nomination was rejected because the text wasn't "germane" enough, by the same standards, this should count as a new article
Converted from a redirect by MaranoFan (talk). Self-nominated at 20:43, 10 September 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Get Him Back! (2nd nomination); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Not a review at this juncture (though I think I might end up reviewing), but something about how the song's music video was filmed on a phone might be a better fact to highlight than the other options? Vaticidalprophet 10:14, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- Indeed, Vaticidalprophet. I came up with the below alts as some possible options.
- ALT2: ... that the music video for Olivia Rodrigo's song "Get Him Back!" was shot on an iPhone 15 Pro?
- ALT3: ... that a Consequence critic thought the clones of Olivia Rodrigo in her "Get Him Back!" music video represented "contradicting voices" in her head?
- Indeed, Vaticidalprophet. I came up with the below alts as some possible options.
- --NØ 10:49, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hey Vaticidalprophet, would you mind explicitly indicating if you are going to review this or not? Potential reviewers might be deterred otherwise. Thanks--NØ 23:52, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
- Somebody with better DYK wiki-lawer skill than me needs to look at this. This first hit mainspace on 2 August and didn't get nominated until 10 September, with an intervening trip through AfD and becoming a redirect. When does the DYK clock actually start ticking? RoySmith (talk) 18:01, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
- @RoySmith: In this case, the clock should have started on September 9, the date the article was converted from a redirect. This would mean the article is indeed eligible for DYK, as stated earlier in the nom which says the article is a former redirect. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 06:34, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
A full review is needed. Flibirigit (talk) 13:06, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Will pick up review now- nomination is within window per above discussion. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 12:56, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |