Template:Did you know nominations/Get Him Back! (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 17:35, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Get Him Back!

Converted from a redirect by MaranoFan (talk). Self-nominated at 20:43, 10 September 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Get Him Back! (2nd nomination); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

  • Not a review at this juncture (though I think I might end up reviewing), but something about how the song's music video was filmed on a phone might be a better fact to highlight than the other options? Vaticidalprophet 10:14, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
--NØ 10:49, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Hey Vaticidalprophet, would you mind explicitly indicating if you are going to review this or not? Potential reviewers might be deterred otherwise. Thanks--NØ 23:52, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
I won't be able to review this one, though I'll mention my preference for ALT2 just in case. Vaticidalprophet 23:53, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Somebody with better DYK wiki-lawer skill than me needs to look at this. This first hit mainspace on 2 August and didn't get nominated until 10 September, with an intervening trip through AfD and becoming a redirect. When does the DYK clock actually start ticking? RoySmith (talk) 18:01, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
@RoySmith: In this case, the clock should have started on September 9, the date the article was converted from a redirect. This would mean the article is indeed eligible for DYK, as stated earlier in the nom which says the article is a former redirect. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 06:34, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
It's been nominated in both seven day windows in either case. This one was 18 minutes after it first hit mainspace.--NØ 21:02, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

A full review is needed. Flibirigit (talk) 13:06, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Will pick up review now- nomination is within window per above discussion. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 12:56, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: IMO, ALTs 0, 1, and 2 are most interesting, but 3 still passes MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 12:56, 22 October 2023 (UTC)