Template:Did you know nominations/International Agrarian Bureau

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:38, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

International Agrarian Bureau

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that the "Green International" did not actually use green as its political color? Conord, pp. 415–416: "Les historiens désignent couramment ce Bureau international agraire comme une «Internationale verte». Cette couleur n’apparaît pourtant pas sur le bulletin de l’organisation, dont les responsables successifs n’usent pas davantage du terme «vert» dans leurs discours" ("Historians commonly designate this International Agrarian Bureau as the 'Green International'. The color does not in fact show up on the organization's bulletin, whose successive editors never make a point of using the term 'green' in their discourse")
  • ALT1:... that the International Agrarian Bureau was criticized from the right as advocating the "peasant-boot dictatorship", and from the left as a vehicle for "peasant individualism"? Francis Stuart Campbell, The Menace of the Herd or Procustes at Large, p. 80. Milwaukee: The Bruce Publishing Company, 1943 (first quote); Adolphe Hodee, "La réaction mondiale. Les agrariens contre le B.I.T.", in Le Peuple. Organe Quotidien du Syndicalisme, June 24, 1921, p. 4 (second quote)

• Reviewed: Ester Peony

5x expanded by Dahn (talk). Self-nominated at 11:22, 6 August 2019 (UTC).

• Comment I've struck out the original hook, since upon researching this obscure issue, it appears that the IAB popularized the usage of a (green) clover, and that at least two member parties did view green as the agrarian color. Dahn (talk) 08:43, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

• This impressive article is a five-fold expansion and is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright or plagiarism issues. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:45, 31 August 2019 (UTC)