Template:Did you know nominations/Jane Doe No. 14 v. Internet Brands, Inc., DBA Modelmayhem.com
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 11:35, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Jane Doe No. 14 v. Internet Brands, Inc., DBA Modelmayhem.com[edit]
- ... the an American court case hinges on whether the Communications Decency Act grants immunity to web-based service providers for civil claims brought by a user for harm caused by another user?
Created/expanded by Squeekur (talk). Nominated by Maimas13 (talk) at 17:26, 29 October 2014 (UTC).
- I'm guessing that the word "American" should be in the hook? Victuallers (talk) 09:37, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
- More importantly, a link to the DYK article must be added. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 04:48, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
- Tried to repair but it could do with a new alt? Victuallers (talk) 10:50, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
This article is new enough and long enough. The article is well sourced and the hook is suitably cited. The article is neutral and I identified no copyright/close paraphrasing issues. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:46, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
