Template:Did you know nominations/Joey Santore

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 22:38, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Joey Santore

Created by Silver seren (talk). Self-nominated at 23:02, 6 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Joey Santore; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

  • Good prose length, is fine with BLP, citations etc look good. Hook is of a reasonable length, citation looks fine. QPQ here is waiting on another QPQ, but it looks fine and there's no point in starting a waiting for QPQ chain. Frzzl (talk) 12:27, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
    • Also, sorry to be meta - you're an experienced Wikipedian, this is my first review; is this how you do them?
      • Sounds fine to me. So long as you address all the points that come up at the top of the screen when you enter a review, which you did, then everything's good. Some people give really short reviews, honestly. And if you ever want to do reviews in a more systematic way, there's a link in the "DYK Toolbox" on the upper right of the edit screen in these reviews that goes to Reviewers' Checklist, a template you can use and fill out when leaving reviews to make sure you got every relevant point. Or you can continue doing reviews in regular words like you did here (which is how I do it, I've never bothered with the template). SilverserenC 16:06, 7 May 2023 (UTC)