Template:Did you know nominations/Kang In-soo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:32, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Kang In-soo[edit]

Kang In-soo
Kang In-soo

Created by Explicit (talk). Self-nominated at 14:02, 13 November 2017 (UTC).

  • Meets length and newness requirements (nominated the day the page was created). Images is appropriately licensed, and all statements that need to be sourced have been sourced. Earwigs detects no copyright problems. Korean-language source accepted in good faith. QPQ provided. Although this is good to go, I'm suggesting additional hooks as I'm not sure if the hook proposed is "hooky" enough; what hook will be used is up to the promoter, though:
ALT1: ... that South Korean singer Kang In-soo (pictured) was accepted as a dance major in Sejong University despite not having learned how to dance? Source: "고등학교 3년 재학 시절 중 2년을 무용을 배우지 않았다는 인수. 아이러니하게도 그는 세종대학교 무용과에 진학했다." / "By his third year of high school, In-soo had not learned how to dance in the two years prior. Ironically, he got into Sejong University as a dance major." (Herald Economy)
ALT2: ... that South Korean singer Kang In-soo sat by a water purifier at a record label's office because he wanted staff to recognize his face? Source: "그는 회사 관계자들이 자주 오고가는 입구 옆 정수기 옆에 앉아서 아무것도 하지 않고 얼굴을 알리려 인사만 했다." / "He sat next to a water purifier at the company's entrance where staff often come and go, greeting them to have his face recognized." (Herald Economy)
Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:36, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Striking original hook per reviewer's suggestion (I agree). New reviewer needed for ALTs 1 & 2. Yoninah (talk) 13:37, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
  • Continuing with this review: ALTs 1 & 2 are good (my preference is for ALT1), but neither one has an inline cite. @Explicit: could you add citations to the end of each sentence that has the hook fact? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 14:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
  • @Yoninah: Added, with additional clarifications made to the article. xplicit 05:11, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
  • Thank you. Going with ALT1 because that has the inline citation after the sentence. Rest of review per Narutolovehinata5. ALT1 good to go. Yoninah (talk) 15:44, 13 December 2017 (UTC)