The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:39, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
This is a well created list, but it does not meet the first rules of DYK, which states "DYK is only for articles that have achieved one of the following within the past seven days: Created, Expanded at least fivefold, Promoted to good article status." I recommend using a sandbox for large-scale updates, then moving into the mainspace, which would have made this list eligible.
I don't agree that this article is too old. The article was moved to mainspace on 29 May and nominated on 1 June. Moving to mainspace counts.--Launchballer 21:12, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Doing... I apologize, I looked at the wrong move dates. I will review again. Flibirigit (talk) 21:17, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
I recommend changing the close paraphrasing on "following a rise from 100 million to 200 million streams per week between 2013 and 2014" as per Earwig. Flibirigit (talk) 21:40, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
I'm not too familiar with the process to request a certain date. Maybe Yoninah could better answer that question? This discussion does not appear on my T:TDYK since it's been verified now. Flibirigit (talk) 23:20, 30 June 2018 (UTC)