The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 00:16, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
... that American serial killer Michael Sumpter was never convicted of murder and it was only after his death that he could be linked to his killings through DNA evidence? Source: [1]
Overall: Article is new, long, sourced, neutral, and plagiarism-free, the QPQ is done, and the hook is cited and interesting (and mentally scarring). Good to go, BuySomeApples, nice work! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 08:15, 27 August 2021 (UTC) 🤠
Article is new, long, sourced, neutral, and plagiarism-free, the QPQ is done, and the hook is cited and interesting (and mentally scarring). Good to go, BuySomeApples, nice work! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 08:15, 27 August 2021 (UTC) 🤠