Template:Did you know nominations/Mike Pringle (physician)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:49, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Mike Pringle (physician)[edit]
- ... that Mike Pringle and Colin Bradley are credited with developing and instituting significant event audit (SEA) into primary care in the UK? SEA…The introduction and development of this technique came from the work of two GPs, Mike Pringle and Colin Bradley.[1]
- ALT1:... that in 2013, Mike Pringle recounted the role of the RCGP in the SAS siege of the Iranian Embassy of 1980? Mike remembered the SAS siege of the Iranian Embassy as ‘the most important thing that happened to the College’ in the 1980s, describing how the SAS drilled a hole in the wall and started feeding in a microphone.[2]
- Reviewed: John Campbell
5x expanded by Whispyhistory (talk) and Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Whispyhistory (talk) at 16:12, 2 July 2019 (UTC).
- Expanded fine, 5x on date. QPQ done, and no copyright issues. Not a big fan of the level 2 sections... Could some of them be level 3? I also don't really like the long list of selected publications, but I don't think it's against MOS per se. Article is well sourced, as are both hooks. I much prefer the first hook, as the second one is wordy and a little confusing to me.
Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 16:59, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you Lee Vilenski...changed some sections. I really cut down on publications and concentrated on the ones that made a difference or related to his major achievements. I will look again and see if I should omit any. Thank you for review. Your suggestions are helpful. Whispyhistory (talk) 19:23, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- Expanded fine, 5x on date. QPQ done, and no copyright issues. Not a big fan of the level 2 sections... Could some of them be level 3? I also don't really like the long list of selected publications, but I don't think it's against MOS per se. Article is well sourced, as are both hooks. I much prefer the first hook, as the second one is wordy and a little confusing to me.
