Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Minnesota History (journal)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:25, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Minnesota History (journal)

[edit]

Moved to mainspace by Bobamnertiopsis (talk). Self-nominated at 02:44, 13 March 2019 (UTC).

  • A better hook probably needs to be proposed here as, even as someone who is interested in academic research myself, this is rather bland. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 03:33, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
How are these? (courtesy pings @Narutolovehinata5:, @Bobamnertiopsis:)
= paul2520 (talk) 13:14, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
The new hooks are far far better (with a preference to ALT2 as it shows the contrast in topics in greater detail). My only concern though is if the mention that it was provided free to the MHS is necessary. That and that the notability tag has to be resolved first. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 21:12, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks Narutolovehinata5. We're working on dealing with the notability tag--we have some sources that will take a little time to track down because they're offline. In lieu of that, here's ALT3:
Thanks! —Collint c 01:55, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Hey Narutolovehinata5, sources have been supplied in response to the notability tag; feel free to take another look and thanks for your patience! —Collint c 03:54, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
  • Full review needed, including the ALT3 hook above. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:26, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Apologies for the delay in the full review, as I have been pretty busy lately. But there doesn't seem to be any problems so this should be good to go. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:49, 10 May 2019 (UTC)