Template:Did you know nominations/Mud pie

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 15:38, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Mud pie[edit]

Fancy mudpies
Fancy mudpies
  • ... that a mud pie is not meant to be eaten and may contain pebbles as an ingredient? Source: "Making mud pies". www.kidspot.com.au. Retrieved 2018-04-23.
    • ALT1:... that some parents actually create outdoor 'kitchens' in which children make mud pies? Source: "Build a Mudpie Station…". Small Potatoes. 2012-03-25. Retrieved 2018-04-23 and "Top 20 of Mud Kitchen Ideas for Kids

5x expanded by Barbara (WVS) (talk). Self-nominated at 13:26, 28 April 2018 (UTC).

  • New enough (5x expansion began on 28 April 2018), not long enough ( 1,381 characters "readable prose size") - 2 (a) Articles must have a minimum of 1,500 characters of prose, fully referenced. The image is of sandcastles, not mud pies, but it does have an appropriate licence. Main hook is okay; ALT1 is unsupported. Stricken. QPQ done. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 10:08, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for your review. I'll get to work. Best regards, Barbara   10:25, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
As this has stalled, I'll pick it up. Date from redirect fine, length is now OK and the hook is very good. QPQ one, no close paraphrasing. I'm happy for this to to be the first DYK in next year's April Fools sets so well done on that. If you change your mind on that, I'll put it back here @Barbara (WVS):. Good to go for April Fools Day then. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 08:36, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Oh my! I am thrilled and flattered. I was the number #1 April's Fool DYK in 2018 and I hope to keep it up. Best Regards, Barbara   12:12, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
  • The QPQ is not a complete review, but it does not appear that the editor is required to submit a QPQ. However, several lines in the Benefits section are not sourced, per Rule D2. I moved up the cite under Techniques to cover all the points, but as I am unable to open the source, I cannot verify that the source indeed covers all these points. Yoninah (talk) 10:40, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
  • In the interests of fleshing out the AFD hooks, I commented out the Benefits section and am promoting this. Yoninah (talk) 15:38, 31 March 2019 (UTC)