Template:Did you know nominations/Planet Her

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: by SL93 (talk) 01:28, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Planet Her

(

)

* ... that Doja Cat has alluded to TOI 1338 b (pictured) being a visual interpretation of the fictional planet which inspired her album Planet Her? Source: Doja Cat tweeting "TOI 1338B" before retweeting a reply saying "is this the scientific name of planet her"

- ALT1:... that Doja Cat based Planet Her on her own fictional planet at the center of the universe on which all species of space exist in harmony? Source: Event occurs 3:36-3:51 in this video: "So basically Planet Her is the center of the universe and its where all races of space exist [...] All species can be in harmony can be in harmony there... that's kind of the lore."
- ALT2:... that by naming her album Planet Her, Doja Cat was "just trying to be cute" and was not promoting a feminist agenda nor a planet exclusively for women? Source: Event occurs 3:13-3:36 in this video "It's not like a feminist thing... It's just like I'm really just tryna be cute and that's all it is. Its not a planet for women, I know I've gotten questions about that."
- ALT3:... that Doja Cat ensured all music videos associated with her album Planet Her took place on different locations across the titular fictional planet and explored each aspect of those respective locations? Source: MTV 0:40-0:50: "Every video for Planet Her will be an exploration of each aspect of the planet" Audacy: 4:16-4:35 "I'm trying to like create a story as it goes and with the next couple visuals I wanna bring people to different locations of Planet Her and show them how people are there and how the different races and species connect with each other..."

Reviewed: Stina Quint

Draft created by Cybertrip (talk) and moved to mainspace by VersaceSpace (talk). Nominated by Cybertrip at 10:57, 16 June 2021 (UTC).

This article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline and any of the hooks could be used. The image is in the public domain, the article is neutral, and I detected no copyright issues (a high reading (84%) on Earwig seems to be another site copying Wikipedia). A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:51, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Returned from queue per talk. —valereee (talk) 18:07, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
Promoters: check article for stability before promoting, and a full recheck of the hook and source would be advisable as the article has been massively edited since it was nominated. —valereee (talk) 13:24, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

The article needs to be reviewed again: the review was made just before the album was released, and the article has quadrupled in size since then, meaning the vast majority of it has not been checked. I don't know whether original reviewer Cwmhiraeth would be willing to do a completely new review of the article as it is now, and check to be sure the hook facts for the three ALT hooks remain in expanded article. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:37, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

I think I will leave it to someone else. It's not my type of article at all and I can't think why I reviewed it in the first place. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:19, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

General eligibility:

New enough:
Long enough:
Other problems:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Second review, the article appears well sourced and neutral. Earwig only picked up false positives for copyvio (direct quotes and song titles). The hooks still hold up, are cited and appear in the article. Only one sentence in the body of the article was uncited, so I added sources to that. The rest of the article is meticulously cited, and the lede contains only info expanded upon in the body. The page also appears stable, no real changes since the 17th (and I doubt there's much left to add). With a little more polish, I think it could also be a good candidate for a GA nomination. BuySomeApples (talk) 03:34, 24 July 2021 (UTC)