Template:Did you know nominations/Regional council of Bourgogne-Franche-Comté

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:02, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Regional council of Bourgogne-Franche-Comté[edit]

Moved to mainspace by Mélencron (talk). Self-nominated at 05:59, 23 April 2018 (UTC).

  • This article is new enough and long enough. The article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. QPQ has been done. I am approving the original hook but not ALT1 which relies on rumour rather than fact. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:00, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
  • Hello, I came by to promote this, but I have some issues with the hook. The article states that Dufay was not elected in the first round, only in the second round. It would have been interesting if Dufay wasn't elected at all, but the article states that she's the incumbent. Also, it's not exactly uncommon for leaders to take several rounds before being elected anyway. Perhaps the hook could be rephrased in a more unique way, or maybe a different hook could be proposed here? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:11, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
  • I think it's worth noting simply because it was unexpected, but I'm unsure about what an alternate hook might look like. Mélencron (talk) 13:41, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Narutolovehinata5 As this nomination is getting nowhere, and because I can't see scope in the article for a more interesting hook, would you consider restoring the tick? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:22, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
I'll ask first Mélencron what they think. ALT0 is workable but may need to be rephrased, to emphasize that Dufay would end up being elected anyway (the hook as it stands implies that she was not). Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 06:43, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
This is the oldest DYK nomination there is right now and I don't really consider either of the existing hooks that interesting either, so I'd suggest withdrawing/archiving this nomination. Mélencron (talk) 13:13, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
@Cwmhiraeth: Thoughts? Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:20, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
@Mélencron and Narutolovehinata5: Well, it's up to Mélencron really. The hook could be rephrased:
  • Cwmhiraeth's rephrasing of the original hook counts as "unique wording" in my book and is approved. I'm promoting this now. Yoninah (talk) 23:00, 16 July 2018 (UTC)