Template:Did you know nominations/Saffron siskin
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vanamonde (talk) 14:59, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Saffron siskin
[edit]... that the diet of the saffron siskin (pictured) consists of seeds, buds, leaves and insects?
- Reviewed: List of destroyers of the Indian Navy
- Comment: Better hooks are welcome
5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 09:15, 31 July 2016 (UTC).
Attractive bird, solid article on good sources. That hook would not make me click. How about mentioning Peru? And/or rarely seen? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:07, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
- ALT1 ... that despite occurring in six protected areas in Ecuador, the saffron siskin (pictured) is rated as a "vulnerable species"? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:19, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
thank you! The image is licensed and a good illustration, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:43, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
Gerda Arendt, please be sure to include in your reviews the criteria you checked against, including size, age, hook in the article and specifically sourced in the relevant sentence(s), copyvio/close paraphrase check, neutrality, etc. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:08, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- I have done more than 100 review this year, and usually have have not said the obvious (new enough, long enough etc), but what's missing, - check my reviews: more often than not I don't simply approve but engage the author in order to improve the article. I believe that is more in the interest of the project than telling an experienced editor that she was able to follow the rules. - A hook by an author I never met before is a different story.
checked against the criteria --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:19, 8 August 2016 (UTC)