Template:Did you know nominations/Satoshi Mitazono

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:26, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Satoshi Mitazono[edit]

  • Reviewed: Aslaug Haviland
  • Comment: I'm not entirely happy with the wording of the hook or what should be piped.

Created by Athomeinkobe (talk). Self-nominated at 05:34, 10 August 2016 (UTC).

  • Comment: Hook wording tweaked in line with comment above. Edwardx (talk) 12:17, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Thanks Edwardx. Just to make things more difficult, a second plant located on the island of Shikoku resumed operation last weekend. (Kagoshima is in the south of Kyushu). Sendai is the only plant within Kagoshima, but there is one other (Genkai) in northern Kyushu. I suppose an ALT blurb could be "Kagoshima's only plant", "Kyushu's only operational plant" or "one of two plants operating in Japan". AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 02:44, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
  • No issues found with article, ready for human review.
    • This article is new and was created on 02:03, 08 August 2016 (UTC)
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 2907 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (1.0% confidence; confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  • No overall issues detected

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 19:08, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

  • ALT1 is unsatisfactory because the article does not mention the other power plant that has reopened. How about
Thanks Cwmhiraeth, but I have just noticed one technical error. As governor he doesn't have the power to suspend the operation himself, so we can't say that he "wants to suspend". So I've reworded it to:
I've updated the article to say that he has submitted two requests to the power company. One reactor is scheduled to be shut down for maintenance early next month, so we better get this finalized before there are any more changes to the situation! AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 07:24, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Going with ALT3 then. The article is new enough and long enough, neutral and very up to date! No copyright issues detected. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:49, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
  • ALT3 lacks an inline cite at the end of the sentence in question. Yoninah (talk) 18:43, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Which sentence? The recent addition is sourced and shows he has submitted 2 requests for suspension during his first month in office. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 21:41, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
  • Thanks, now I see it. I added the power plant name again so it will be clearer. Restoring tick per Cwmhiraeth's review. Yoninah (talk) 22:22, 10 September 2016 (UTC)