Template:Did you know nominations/The Shorter Cambridge Medieval History
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 08:23, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
The Shorter Cambridge Medieval History
- ... that reviewers wondered whether there were so many facts in the The Shorter Cambridge Medieval History that it had become chronicle rather than history?
- ALT1: ... that ...?
- Reviewed: Broken toe
Created by Philafrenzy (talk) and Whispyhistory (talk). Nominated by Philafrenzy (talk) at 23:05, 10 November 2021 (UTC).
- Still got some reviews to integrate. Philafrenzy (talk) 23:05, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- There are more but I am done for now. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:27, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
New article is 7,251 characters long and nominated two days after creation. No copyvios detected and duplication detector of online sources[1][2] reveal no close paraphrasing issues (AGF sources which can't go through Dup detector). Article is well-sourced. Hook is 152 characters long (under 200 character max.) and is interesting. Ref 8 (verifying the hook) is a reliable source. QPQ done. Looks good to go! —Bloom6132 (talk) 08:41, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
