Template:Did you know nominations/Watchdog (research collective)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 00:48, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Watchdog (research collective)

(

)

... that Watchdog created a fact-checking app within 36 hours of its founding? Source: [1]
- Reviewed: This is my first DYK nomination, so not required.

Created by Isi96 (talk). Self-nominated at 23:23, 9 July 2022 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: None required.

Overall: The hook is interesting and cited. This article is new enough, sourced and (barely) meets length requirements. ~~However, there is a little too much close paraphrasing.~~ Once this is fixed it looks ready to be promoted. (P.S. I piped the article title in the hook to make it a little shorter and punchier.) BuySomeApples (talk) 02:26, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

@BuySomeApples Thank you for the feedback, I've rephrased the problematic content. How does it look? Isi96 (talk) 12:04, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- Nice work @Isi96: thank you! BuySomeApples (talk) 04:37, 21 July 2022 (UTC)