The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that in Why Marx Was Right, author Terry Eagleton aims to refute ten common objections to Marxism? Source: Archer, Jeff (2013). "Why Marx Was Right (Review)". Social Alternative. 32 (1). ISSN0155-0306. "At the start of each of the ten chapters Eagleton summarises in a succinct paragraph an argument that has been widely used to condemn Marx, Marxists or Marxism, and he then commences a repudiation of the argument."
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
Interesting:
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Article is brand new, long enough, very well sourced and neutral. No copyvio on Earwig. Assuming good faith on the hook, which is interesting enough. qpq has been provided. BuySomeApples (talk) 01:08, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
Article is brand new, long enough, very well sourced and neutral. No copyvio on Earwig. Assuming good faith on the hook, which is interesting enough. qpq has been provided. BuySomeApples (talk) 01:08, 18 August 2021 (UTC)