Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Yisa Yu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Round symbols for illustrating comments about the DYK nomination The following is an archived discussion of Yisa Yu's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you knowDYK comment symbol (talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.

The result was: promoted by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:48, 15 February 2013 (UTC).

Yisa Yu

[edit]
  • ... that Chinese singer Yisa Yu participated three times in the Super Girl singing contest before reaching the top ten in 2009?
  • ALT1:... that fans of Chinese singer Yisa Yu nickname her Yu jin xiang (郁金香), which means "tulip"?

Created by Orionist (talk). Self nom at 21:40, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. I've added several new references to the article, I hope it's good to go now. Cheers! -- Orionisttalk 02:01, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Reviewer needed to see whether these updates resolved the issues. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:29, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Sorry, forgot about this review. The orange tag stating the article needs more sources remains, and I do see some specific places where a source should be added. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:34, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks for having a second look. The orange tag was added when the article had only one source, it has 23 now so I removed it. I added a couple more references where you put cn tags. I hope you don't mind if I don't cite the other two as that'd mean linking to sites listing the songs or albums for sale which would be spammy. I think a singer being on a film/drama OST is hardly contentious or controversial so this should be well within policy, and the hooks are unrelated anyway. So, third time a charm? -- Orionisttalk 22:55, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Again let this slip. My bad, I'm crazed at work these days. Anywho, thanks for adding those sources. Your explanation for not linking to sites that sell stuff is valid, and since it isn't controversial I guess it's okay by me. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:34, 14 February 2013 (UTC)