Wikiedit Article:

Transformational Leadership[edit]

In an experimental study conducted on the relationship between leaders' moral reasoning and subordinates' perceptions of leadership behaviors in three organizational samples drawn from two countries. Kohlberg (1969, 1976) initially proposed a stage theory of cognitive moral development to explain how people think (or reason) about interacting with their social environment. He argued that people's present moral capacity incorporates problem-solving strategies learned at earlier stages. The data used in this study were collected by questionnaire from one organization in Canada (Sample 1) and two organizations in the United Kingdom (Samples 2 and 3). He found that, 132 leaders and 407 subordinates participated in this study. Sample 1 was drawn from a mid-sized Canadian university and consisted of middle-level managers ( n = 64) and subordinates ( n = 185) in clerical and administrative posts who rated these managers. Data for Sample 2 were collected at a large telecommunications company in the United Kingdom. Raters in this sample were subordinates working in technical support and customer service ( n = 136) who described their middle-level managers ( n = 43). Sample 3 consisted of hospital ward managers ( n = 25) and their subordinate nurses ( n = 86) working in a mid-sized hospital in the United Kingdom.

Turner, N., Barling, J., Epitropaki, O., Butcher, V., & Milner, C. (2002). Transformational Leadership and Moral Reasoning. Journal Of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 304-311.--Keronica Grant (talk) 06:22, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

This is the user sandbox of Keronica Grant. A user sandbox is a subpage of the user's user page. It serves as a testing spot and page development space for the user and is not an encyclopedia article. Create or edit your own sandbox here.

Other sandboxes: Main sandbox | Template sandbox

Finished writing a draft article? Are you ready to request review of it by an experienced editor for possible inclusion in Wikipedia? Submit your draft for review!

LIFE IS WHAT YOU MAKE!!!. ENJOY IT WHILE IT LAST NEVER KNOW WHAT TOMARROW BRING--Keronica Grant (talk) 09:34, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

The edit war I found is,Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace. 
The star wars episode have been reverted numerous amount of time ,
which include the latest change:
Opening crawl replaced with a new one explaining why the edit 
was made;Re-editing of nearly all scenes featuring Jar Jar 
Binks and removing some of what Nichols dubs 'Jar Jar Antics'
Removal or re-editing of most of the Battle Droid dialogue
Limiting of exposition throughout the film
Trimming scenes involving politics
Re-arrangement of shots and scenes to match the original Star Wars
trilogy's presentation style
Removal of "Yippee" and "Oops" from Anakin's dialogue
Removal of dialogue that specifies the nature of midichlorians as a
biological basis for Force sensitivity
There were a total of 18 minutes cut from the original film, reducing
the run time from 136 minutes to 118 minutes.

 The Phantom Menace
 meets the definiton of an    
edit war because the original edit of the star Episode wars 
was replaced by other editor's
contribution. Although, I didn't see the 3RR violation,
I still believe that this article is still considered as 
an edit war, due to the different changes by editors, 
it is clear that there are some disagreement and changes 
from the original sceen.

In this case the original episode was revert by other 
editors since 2000, and the last revert was made on 
January 17, 2013, when an editor made changes to what
another editor had posted;also I realized that there 
were disagreement among authors

--Keronica Grant (talk) 16:15, 13 February 2013 (UTC)