Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback[edit]

Name of student reviewer	Wikipedia User:Joselv83
Date of review	5/9/2013
Name of editor	Wikipedia User: Keronica_Grant
URL of editor’s Userpage	http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keronica_Grant
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page	05/9/13
Date review submitted to instructor	05/9/13
Length of edit (too long/too short)	Good Length
Image (needed/appropriate)	N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)	Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed	N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)	Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting	Good Formatting.
Grammar & composition	Good Grammar.
Other comments	Good job overall!

Joselv83 (talk) 17:13, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Feedback[edit]

Name of student reviewer: Christina GeoHaghan Christina geo

Date of review: 5/3/13

Name of editor: Keronica Grant Keronica_Grant

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 2/13/13

Date review submitted to instructor: 4/30/13

Length of edit (too long/too short): too long

Image (needed/appropriate): Not needed

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Yes

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: Yes

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes

Wikiformatting: multiple sentences, correct grammar and punctuation

Other comments:

--Christina geo (talk) 20:20, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Name of student reviewer **Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User: DJames5

Date of review- 5/6/13

Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page**- Keronica Grant

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page- 5/6/13

Date review submitted to instructor- 5/6/13

Length of edit (too long/too short)- Too long

Image (needed/appropriate)- n/a

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)- Yes

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed- Yes

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)- Yes

Wikiformatting- Good

Grammar & composition- Good

Other comments- None

DJames5 (talk) 16:22, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback Name of student reviewer: Trinirebel (talk) 16:07, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Date of review 05/06/2013

Name of editor: Keronica_Grant

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/06/2013

Date review submitted to instructor 05/06/2013

Length of edit (too long/too short) Appropriate length of edit

Image (needed/appropriate) None applicable for this edit

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate information provided directly from text the text book

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate information provided

Wikiformatting Exemplary formatting

Grammar & composition Grammar and spelling were error free

Other comments Exemplary edit. Trinirebel (talk) 16:08, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]