User:Matty.007/Archive 13:April 2014-May 2014

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
User:Matty.007 User_Talk:Matty.007 User:Matty.007/Awards User:Matty.007/My DYKs User:Matty.007/My GAs User:Matty.007/Biography pile User:Matty.007/guestbook User:Matty.007/Adoption Homepage User:Matty.007/Userboxes I've Made User:Matty.007/sandbox/Funny stuff User:Matty.007/CSD log User:Matty.007/Redlinks  
Home Talk Barnstars, Food, Kittens... My DYKs My Good Articles Please help get these British people up to GA Guestbook Adoption Homepage Userboxes I've Made Funny Stuff Things I have CSDed Please help out creating these vital pages  


DYK for 2014 IPC Powerlifting World Championships

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:48, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Madman's Drum

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:39, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Ernest Radcliffe Bond

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:54, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Passionate Journey

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 07:09, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Pineau de Re

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 15:23, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Leighton Aspell

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 15:23, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 April 2014

DYK for 2012 Summer Paralympics

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 07:30, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Re: Template:Did you know nominations/2014 Ürümqi attack

Hello, Matty.007. You have new messages at Bloom6132's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thank you for the barnstar and for all the info you added to the article. —Bloom6132 (talk) 16:20, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Matty.007. You have new messages at ToBk's talk page.
Message added 19:05, 2 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ToBk (talk) 19:05, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

ITN for 2014 Badakhshan mudslides

--SpencerT♦C 23:42, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Adore You

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:00, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

The Mikhail Lomonosov Award

The Mikhail Lomonosov Award
The Mikhail Lomonosov Award is hereby presented to Matty.007 for tireless and proactive contributions to DYK. Keep up the good work. It's the scribes who build libraries. — Maile (talk) 15:43, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Thank you very much Maile! I've not been nominating too much recently, but I hope to be nominating some more soon! All the best, Matty.007 15:47, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Creating new article for Anamika Mishra

Hello Friend,

I want to request a article of famous India author Anamika Mishra whose 1st novel Too hard To handle was a best seller and her next novel is ready to hit the market any time.Her Interview was published in Hindustan Times , Lucknow Tribune , The Desert Trail and Millenium Post news papers and can also be seen on websites.Her official website is anamikamishra.com and her facebook id is facebook.com/anamikamishraa which consist of 10,000+ fans and her book page is facebook.com/NovelTooHardToHandle .

1.187.222.162 (talk) 19:16, 3 May 2014 (UTC) Happy

Hi 1.187.222.162! Articles need reliable sources to be created, interviews can only be used to supplement separate coverage of Mishra. If you can paste the URLs of two different pages which talk about Mishra then I may write an article, but at the minute I can't see anything that suggests she is notable. Thanks, Matty.007 19:23, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014 April newsletter

Round 3 of the 2014 WikiCup has just begun; 32 competitors remain. Pool G's Oh, better far to live and die / Under the brave black flag I fly... Adam Cuerden (submissions) was Round 2's highest scorer, with a large number of featured picture credits. In March/April, he restored star charts from Urania's Mirror, lithographs of various warships (such as SMS Gefion) and assorted other historical media. Second overall was Pool E's Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions), whose featured list Silver certificate (United States) contains dozens of scans of banknotes recently promoted to featured picture status. Third was Pool G's United States ChrisGualtieri (submissions) who has produced a large number of good articles, many, including Falkner Island, on Connecticut-related topics. Other successful participants included Rhodesia Cliftonian (submissions), who saw three articles (including the top-importance Ian Smith) through featured article candidacies, and Washington, D.C. Caponer (submissions), who saw three lists (including the beautifully-illustrated list of plantations in West Virginia) through featured list candidacies. High-importance good articles promoted this round include narwhal from Canada Reid,iain james (submissions), tiger from Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) and The Lion King from Minas Gerais Igordebraga (submissions). We also saw our first featured topic points of the competition, awarded to Nepal Czar (submissions) and Indiana Red Phoenix (submissions) for their work on the Sega Genesis topic. No points have been claimed so far for good topics or featured portals.

192 was our lowest qualifying score, again showing that this WikiCup is the most competitive ever. In previous years, 123 (2013), 65 (2012), 41 (2011) or 100 (2010) secured a place in Round 3. Pool H was the strongest performer, with all but one of its members advancing, while only the two highest scorers in Pools G and F advanced. At the end of June, 16 users will advance into the semi-finals. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 17:57, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Algerine (J213)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article HMS Algerine (J213) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TLSuda -- TLSuda (talk) 18:21, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Algerine (J213)

The article HMS Algerine (J213) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:HMS Algerine (J213) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TLSuda -- TLSuda (talk) 18:41, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of HMS Algerine (J213)

The article HMS Algerine (J213) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:HMS Algerine (J213) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of TLSuda -- TLSuda (talk) 19:01, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Bitey, maybe?

This nomination of a new page for speedy deletion four seconds after its creation might be a bit bitey. I generally like to put pages like that on my watchlist and see if the user updates them with the next 10 or 15 minutes. If not, then I'll tag. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:53, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Only four seconds? I will send my apologies to the article creator. I just patrol the new page feed when I have nothing to do, I don't often look at the time. I think that most CSDs (advertising, nonsensical) are OK soon after creation, I should have held fire a bit longer. Thanks for the heads up WikiDan61. Best, Matty.007 17:56, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

ITN

Hi Matty, I hadn't realised that the WikiCup was awarding points for ITN nominations. Perhaps that's why you've started making so many nominations, most without articles. I'd suggest you let people know that's why you're doing this because it's been unclear why you've suddenly made so many noms without articles. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:58, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

I had just found my way there naturally, believe it or not! The reason I have been nominating without articles is that I want to be sure the thing is notable, I don't massively want to spend one hour writing an article, for it to not meet GNG. I generally can tell, but I find news stories more contentious on notability. Anyway, if the subject is considered notable and no-one has beaten me to it, I have no problem creating the article soonish. Thanks, Matty.007 18:00, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Re: Peer review

Oh yeah... I meant to follow up this weekend -- I did see your responses -- but I got distracted with RealLife (tm). Sorry. I'll make an effort to get to it tonight after work & when my daughter has gone to bed. -- llywrch (talk) 19:30, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

I don't know if I was that speedy in responding, but thank you very much for the barnstar! :-) llywrch (talk) 18:20, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Faster than in any other peer review I've had! Thanks again, Matty.007 18:24, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

ITN credit

ThaddeusB (talk) 03:15, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Declined speedy

I've declined the speedy on Trendspotters.tv because the sourcing in the article asserts just enough notability to where it isn't entirely a clean speedy. I'd probably recommend AfD for this one. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:30, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up, I think I was a bit hasty with that one: I should have given it more time before CSD. Thanks, Matty.007 18:11, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Benedict Cumberbatch at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 16:36, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

vandal user

Hey there, Matty. I found a user/IP address who made a large amount of vandal contributions to wikipedia- 137.90.136.111. I sent a warning to them on their talk page, noting that if they kept vandalizing that I would alert an administrator, but I couldn't find any administrators that appeared active recently, so I figured I would send it to you to send to someone, as you're often active (more than me) and might be more knowledgeable about this sort of thing. exoplanetaryscience (talk) 18:04, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Given how spread out the incidents are, I'm not sure there is much we can do. If there are 5 or so vandalisms in a month I think they can be blocked (warning templates are used 5 times), but admins may block for less than that. If you want me to recommend an admin I have had contact with, Huon and Crisco 1492 have always been nice. Thanks, Matty.007 18:17, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
On the same topic, it appears that the user shares several IP addresses that they edit with to spread the blame around and not be sourced to a single address- 137.90.136.25, 137.90.136.47, 137.90.136.49, 137.90.136.65, 137.90.136.66, 137.90.136.69, 137.90.136.75, 137.90.136.76, 137.90.136.77, 137.90.136.78, 137.90.136.79, 137.90.136.80, 137.90.136.100, 137.90.136.106, 137.90.136.107, 137.90.136.108, 137.90.136.109, 137.90.136.110, 137.90.136.111, 137.90.136.112, and 137.90.136.113. Isn't it kind of not allowed to have several accounts like this? exoplanetaryscience (talk) 00:56, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
It seems like the user has simply had their IP changed, mine changes regularly so I am not sure if it constitutes IP hopping. However, I am sketchy on this and would strongly advise asking an admin. Thanks, Matty.007 16:19, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Marcel Hug

v/r - TP 22:20, 7 May 2014 (UTC) 23:48, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Boat Race 2000

The article The Boat Race 2000 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Boat Race 2000 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 19:01, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 May 2014

Reference Errors on 9 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Benedict Cumberbatch

Materialscientist (talk) 10:10, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Template:2014–15 Premier League table

Hi,

Thanks for creating Template:2014–15 Premier League table. However there are multiple issues with the template and reasons why it has not been created yet.

First of all there is consensus at WT:FOOTY to remove the years name it only "Premier League table" so we can use same template season after season without creating new one s every season. Just substitute the template on the pages it is used and then reset it with new teams.

Secondly this templates use helper templates such as template:PL13 which is used and you have added that template (for last season) even in this new template. This template is also to be removed (perhaps never used again)

Thirdly the template:fb cl team is supposed to be replaced by template:fb cl2 team by WT:FOOTY consensus and a TfD.

Finally the template has had a lot of problems with editors not updating the helper template so there has been a new version created without helper template that is being considered being used instead.

Just letting you know so that you dont get surprised if the template gets a major overhauling or even gets deleted (via TfD). QED237 (talk) 16:29, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

I'm afraid I don't know much about tables in such depth as this, I copied this from the last season's one. I can't see any discussion at the Project regarding this, please can you link me? I only used this season's template, so have no idea about the templates within the templates I'm afraid. Thanks, Matty.007 16:33, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
No problem, it is a bit complicated. Have to eat now but I will provide the links later. The table will work now as long as it stays on only the PL article and not spread to the team articles. In general there is consensus to use these templates, but they are in development phase and there are new solutions popping up once in a while,that has not gone through WT:FOOTY. QED237 (talk) 16:39, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
That explains why the bit saying where teams are in the league isn't working... Thanks, Matty.007 16:41, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi again. I would start by appologizing if this edit is a bit long (and for my bad english) but I will try and explain the league table templates for you and after that provide some links for my concerns above.
Basically for a few months ago the idea of using a template for league tables was brought in to wikipedia since many/all league article and also the clubs individual article, have the table but many were not updated for weeks. A central template could then be updated by a single editor and then table on all pages was updated and correct (instead of being old an inncorect)
The problem was to show only a few teams on the club pages (only interesting to show the closest placed teams) and not all teams as we do on main league article, and also how to determine what teams to show. The solution can be seen in Template:2013–14 Premier League table and helper template template:PL13 to keep track of positions (redirect to Template:2013–14 Premier League table/p). In the main league template there are switches to determine what rows to be displayed. So in the article for sixth placed team we have switch for this row to be shown on article for 4th,5th,6th,7th and 8th. This makes sure that we show 5 teams on all the team article (two before in league and two behind). Hard to explain so if you have more questions just ask me.
The current problem we have been having is that editors have failed to update the helper template (so it could be a table of teams placed 5th,8th,11th,12th and 16th) which is why we try find new solutions so that only one template needs updating (for most of the season). The current solution can be seen at {{2014–15 Eredivisie table}} and Template:2014–15 Eredivisie table/layout. At my talk you can see start of discussion with another user regarding this (I just responded at their talk).
Regarding the consensus to use these templates you can read about it at
  1. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 83#Use of template tables on 2013–14 Football League One and 2013–14 Football League Two
  2. Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 83#Background color or bolding specific team in table
  3. Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 121#Displaying a part of the table
About the naming of templates and not using 2014-15 you can read at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football/Archive 84#Template:2013–14 X league table‎ or Template:Current X league table and this TfD. Already renamed template are for example Template:Current Fußball-Bundesliga table‎.
If there is something I missed to link to or if you have any questions just ask and I will answer as good as I can. I have your talk at my watchlist so I should se response here but I may miss it so in that case feel free to contact me at my talk. QED237 (talk) 19:54, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the explanation. I think I understand, but not enough to be able to fix it. Did this user's edit fix it? Thanks, Matty.007 20:16, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Yes it helped it for now, probably will be restructured in the future but now it is working. QED237 (talk) 20:37, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 11 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kingstonian F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page London League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tintin in Tibet may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • he was consistently faced by images of what he described as "the beauty and cruelty of white".{{sfn|Sadoul|1975} As he would later relate to the interviewer [[Numa Sadoul]]: <blockquote>"At the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:58, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of currencies in North America may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | {{flag|Aruba}} (''[[Holland]]''}
  • |}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:38, 29 May 2014 (UTC)


DYK nomination of Cumberland Island horse

Hello! Your submission of Cumberland Island horse at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 23:41, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 May 2014

DYK nomination of 2014 Aleppo bombing

Hello! Your submission of 2014 Aleppo bombing at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:03, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of 2014 Po Toi Island ship collision

Hello! Your submission of 2014 Po Toi Island ship collision at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! v/r - TP 23:36, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Some days it rains - some days the sun shines - some days nothing happens

Sorry the review on the Cumberland Island Horses is taking so long. But I guess better that than this. And maybe I should just have done a delete instead. I think initiative is being killed, one molecule at a time. Sigh. This, too, shall pass. But some periods just seem like long stretches of storm clouds. — Maile (talk) 23:55, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Beautiful title. I completely agree, we don't want anything remotely dubious on the main page, if that means a nom takes weeks, then so be it. Best, Matty.007 19:09, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

DYK for 2014–15 FA Cup

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:14, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Claim

Difference is in who is providing the number. SOHR has been designated as an authoritative source on casualty figures by the reliable news media (AFP, AP, BBC, CNN, Guardian, Reuters, etc) on numerous occasions, while the rebel group has no reliability backing it when claiming the number. So saying that the rebel group "gave the death toll as 50" instead of "claimed" makes it sound like the rebel group has some reliability behind it when providing the number. EkoGraf (talk) 17:08, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

I would have said that the next sentence negates the thought that the rebels had a method, as it does SOHR. Thanks, Matty.007 17:19, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Hmmm, could you give me an example of a sentence that you think would be appropriate? EkoGraf (talk) 22:41, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
To be brutally honest I'm not sure I could. I think that using "gave the number of dead as X" is neutral, but if you disagree with me then I think the article's fine how it is. Thanks, Matty.007 18:04, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

2014 Latakia offensive

Matty, if you could take a look at the article 2014 Latakia offensive that would be great. Recent edits could do with an objective pair of eyes. 94.197.120.49 (talk) 18:39, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Which part? Thanks, Matty.007 18:43, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
He means the edit war over insertion of un-sourced material and removal of sourced material that he and I have been at for the last week. Check the edit history. You can also check Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive262#2014 Latakia Offensive. For the most part we have settled things in regards to the objections/problems he had over: the comparisons between this flight of Armenians to the exodous during the earlier genocide by some people; the propaganda war between the two sides; what kind of militias supported the Army, etc. Today he has a problem with the result of the offensive where he removed the most recent sources and replaced them with older ones (a month older), and has a high desire to point out that government forces who recaptured territory from rebels were reinforced. Frankly I don't understand a reason for pointing that out, especially considering it already says in the results section that forces were diverted. But he insists with adding sources that allegedly say that those specific reinforced forces were the ones who recaptured the territory, but actually they don't. EkoGraf (talk) 22:10, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
To be honest I'm not really sure who's right here without scrutinising over sources, though from an outer perspective, newer sources often are more accurate. Thanks, Matty.007 18:13, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

ITN credit

ThaddeusB (talk) 19:00, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Haha! Thank you ThaddeusB, that wasn't why I was asking, but thank you! Best, Matty.007 19:02, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
Didn't think it was, but like I said I try to give them out to newer ITN contributors. :) --ThaddeusB (talk) 19:37, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

List of Currencies

Hi Matty- Would you mind if I tweak the table in the list just a little bit, I think I can get it to also sort by country (without the blocks of countries getting in the way. I take no offense at all if you revert any changes... -Godot13 (talk) 20:32, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for being so polite as to ask! I have no problem, and am now off wiki till sometime tomorrow, so rest assured I won't revert anything until then if I do, though I rarely revert major changes. Best, Matty.007 20:46, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited May 2014 Ürümqi attack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Weibo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

DYK for 2014 Po Toi Island ship collision

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:13, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Millie Knight

The article Millie Knight you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Millie Knight for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Montanabw -- Montanabw (talk) 19:01, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tintin in Tibet

The article Tintin in Tibet you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tintin in Tibet for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Prhartcom -- Prhartcom (talk) 19:21, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Another GA

Congrats on your GA, and thanks for the barnstar!!! Prhartcom (talk) 19:23, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much for such a detailed review, and I apologise again for losing my temper. Best, Matty.007 19:27, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Oh me too, I thought I was the one who lost their temper. It was all a learning experience, perhaps. My suggestion in the future is to be careful of what you nominate for GA, because there are a lot of reviewers worse than me out there (like the FA reviewers, ugh). All the best, Prhartcom (talk) 19:36, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Good luck on your DYK; I'd certainly be interested in seeing that article on the main page! Prhartcom (talk) 12:34, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
Thank you very much. Please feel free to comment or add alternative hooks. Best, Matty.007 12:51, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

ITN for May 2014 Ürümqi attack

--SpencerT♦C
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Matty.007/Archive_13:April_2014-May_2014&oldid=1088076642"