Jump to content

User:Wfrigeri/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notes on Culture of Ancient Rome

- Message that article needs additional citations for verification - The article seems neutral, most of the content is factual and from a reliable source, not opinion based. - The viewpoint of the importance of the forum is heavily represented, but that was an important part of Roman culture so it is relevant. The importance of language, religion, and the arts is also emphasized, and backed up by archeological and written evidence. - The links I clicked to check citations all worked, and the article didn't appear to plagarise or paraphrase too closely.

(Politics of Latin Literature)Emergence of Latin Literature: Latin literature emerged through the elite sector of a traditional aristocratic empire. The production of literature, by and for an elite that looked to expand it's dominance over other sectors of the population, shaped the characteristics of the work.[1] When viewed collectively the Latin literature of the classical period aimed to advance the interests of Roman elites.This literature worked to foster the development of a distinct dialect, provide a means of recruitment, and negotiating negotiating conflicts over value and authority.[1]

Philosophy: Roman philosophical treatises have had great influence on the world, but the original thinking came from the Greeks. Roman philosophical writings are rooted in four 'schools' from the age of the Hellenistic Greeks.[2] The four 'schools' were that of the Epicureans, Stocis, Peripatetics, and Academy.[2] Epicureans believed in the guidance of the senses, and identified the supreme goal of life to be happiness, or the absence of pain. Stoicism was founded by Zeno of Citium, who taught that virtue was the supreme good, creating a new sense of ethical urgency. The Perpatetics were followers of Aristotle, guided by his science and philosophy. The Academy was founded by Plato and was based on the Sceptic Pyro's idea that real knowledge could be acquired. The Academy also presented criticisms of the Epicurean and Stoic schools of philosophy.[3]

History: The Greeks and Romans founded history, and had great influence on the way history is written today. Cato the Elder was a Roman senator, as well as the first man to write history in Latin. Although theoretically opposed to Greek influence, Cato the Elder wrote the first Greek inspired rhetorical textbook in Latin (91), and combined strains of greek and Roman history into a method combining both.[4] One of Cato the Elder's great historical achievements was the Origines, which chronicles the story of Rome, from Aeneas to his own day, but this document is now lost. In the second and early first centuries BC an attempt was made, led by Cato the Elder, to use the records and traditions that were preserved, in order to reconstruct the entire. past of Rome. The historians engaged in this task are often referred to as the "Annalists", implying that their writings more or less followed chronological order.[4] In 123 BC and official endeavor was made to provide a record of the whole of Roman history. This work filled eighty books and was known as the Annales Maximi. The composition recorded the official events of the State, such as elections and commands, civic, provincial and cult business, set out in formal arrangements year by year.[4]

In the ancient world, poetry usually played a far more important part of daily life than it does today. In general, educated Greeks and Romans thought of poetry as playing a much more fundamental part of life than in modern times. Initially in Rome poetry was not considered a suitable occupation for important citizens, but the attitude changed in the second and first centuries BC.[5] In Rome poetry considerably preceded prose writing in date. As Aristotle pointed out, poetry was the first sort of literate to arouse people's interest in questions of style. The importance of poetry in the Roman Empire was so strong that Quintilian, the greatest authority on education, wanted secondary schools to focus on the reading and teaching of poetry, leaving prose writings to what would now be referred to as the university stage.[5] Aristotle believed that poetry is more important than history because it is concerned with truths of general significance, instead of the particular facts of history.

Prose: Roman prose developed its sonority, dignity, and rhythm in persuasive speech.[6] Rhetoric had already been key to many great achievements in Athens, so after studying the Greeks the Romans ranked oratory highly as a subject and a profession.[7] Written speeches were some of the first forms of prose writing in ancient Rome, and other forms of prose writing in the future were influenced by this. Sixteen books of Cicero's letters have survived, all published by after Cicero's death by his secretary, Tito. the letters provide a look at the social life in the days of the falling republic, providing pictures of the personalities of this epoch.[8] The letters of Cicero are vast and varied, and provide pictures of the personalities of this epoch. Cicero's personality is most clearly revealed, emerging as a vain vacillating, snobbish man. Cicero's passion for the public life of the capital also emerges from his letters, most clearly when he was in exile and when he took on a provincial governorship in Asia Minor. The letters also contain much about Cicero's family life, and it's political and financial complications.[8]

  1. ^ a b Habinek, Thomas. The Politics of Latin Literature. Princeton New Jersey: Princeton University Press. p. 3.
  2. ^ a b Grant, Michael (1954). Roman Literature. Cambridge England: University Press. pp. 30–45.
  3. ^ Grant, Michael (1954). Roman Literature. Cambridge England: University Press. pp. Notes.
  4. ^ a b c Grant, Michael (1954). Roman Literature. Cambridge England: University Press. pp. 91–94.
  5. ^ a b Grant, Michael (1954). Roman Literature. Cambridge England: University Press. p. 134.
  6. ^ Tenney, Frank (1930). Life and Literature in the Roman Republic. Berkeley California: University of California Press. p. 132.
  7. ^ Tenney, Frank (1930). Life and Literature in the Roman Republic. Berkeley California: University of California Press. p. 35.
  8. ^ a b Grant, Michael (1954). Roman Literature. Cambridge England: University Press. pp. 78–84.