Jump to content

User talk:Админ.МК

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello Админ.МК and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2023 November 19, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! -Lemonaka‎ 05:07, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and welcome. I suggest that you request deletion for this RfA page. (You can make the request by replacing the content with {{db-author}}.) You'll need more experience on Wikipedia to earn support for admin rights. You might find Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates helpful. Cheers! Schazjmd (talk) 00:00, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. When an editor removes content, stating in the edit summary that the source provided did not support the claim, don't restore it without providing a reference that does support it. Schazjmd (talk) 00:41, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Information icon Hi Админ.МК! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Schazjmd (talk) 00:43, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That edit/add has been done by representative admin of the article, and hold articles/notabilities and sources to Wikipedia guidelines, some of the link are retired but however the IMDb authorization/verification for the award is still live. " Macedonian " све е по правилата и како сто треба. Админ.МК (talk) 00:47, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is no such thing as "representative admin of the article". IMDb is not a reliable source, see WP:IMDB. Schazjmd (talk) 00:49, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What i meant is " from the Spider-Man representatives/managers team ". as i mentioned it's retired the link are only on archives on the magazine of Bodil Админ.МК (talk) 00:51, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Mike Allen 01:31, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

These edits seem related to a dispute on Wikiquote about the notability of a Macedonian 18 year-old named Vacil Kacarov. A "news story" about Kacarov does not mention any work in cinematography by the "entrepreneur, actor, and philanthropist from Gevgelija, North Macedonia." HouseOfChange (talk) 02:12, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA[edit]

Hello, Админ.МК,

You haven't filed a proper RFA. Please read over the guidance at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship for instructions and links to tell you how to properly file a Request for Adminship so that other editors will actually see it. However, you only have 22 edits to your account so there is 0 chance that anyone will support your candidacy. Maybe after 10-20,000 edits and editing for 2 or 3 years, you might have a better chance of being supported in your attempt to become an administrator. But as a very new editor, you will not be supported. I encourage you to tag your RfA nomination with a CSD G7 tag.

If you have any questions about editing on Wikipedia or becoming an administrator, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:23, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Админ.МК. Did you use WP:LLM / ChatGPT to write your RFA? Also have you ever edited English Wikipedia using any other accounts? –Novem Linguae (talk) 07:21, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Novem Linguae This one has suspected sockpuppetry on English Wikiquote, however due to some reasons, we decide to give them another chance. I also suspect they have more than one account on this project, but I have no clues for requesting checkuser. -Lemonaka‎ 01:28, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse) for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Liz Read! Talk! 02:43, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Админ.МК, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Админ.МК and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Админ.МК during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -Lemonaka‎ 01:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]