Jump to content

User talk:مرد ایرانی

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, مرد ایرانی, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Ahunt (talk) 13:05, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sarkis Khan Davidkhanian has been accepted

[edit]
Sarkis Khan Davidkhanian, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 05:05, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Davit Davidkhanian has been accepted

[edit]
Davit Davidkhanian, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:14, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:TheEdgarBox per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheEdgarBox. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 02:12, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

مرد ایرانی (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am an Iranian man from Isfahan (من ایرانی هستم انشاالله), and have dedicated my editing to ensuring figures from Iranian history are represented in English wikipedia. I have edited a variety of pages, from the Qajar princes to constitutional reformists to military elites, such as the Davidkhanians, and have converted Persian pages into English. I am not a sock puppet—I consider myself a Wikihobbit in the Qajar niche, more specifically a gnome who makes small page edits and occasional creations. Please allow me to continue this work. I have read the English rules and will continue to follow them. If I have made a mistake, I would be honored to learn on this platform. مرد ایرانی (talk) 23:32, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the concerns raised, nor the technical confirmation, at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheEdgarBox/Archive. Yamla (talk) 21:50, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

مرد ایرانی (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I would like to ask how behavioral pattern is evidence of block? Overlapping pages, all prominent in my country's history, are not evidence but coincidence. Additionally, sock puppets of theEdgarBox as mentioned at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheEdgarBox/Archive are cited as using literary references, which I do not, diverting another piece of evidence used to incriminate other socks. EdgarBox puppets also edited pages of living people. Mine are all of Iranian history as for my language. Finally, my IP is not from an educational establishment. I am here to make positive contributions to articles of Iranian history. The pages I have created demonstrate that fact. Please reinstate me so I can continue this work.مرد ایرانی (talk) 16:53, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

My use of the checkuser tool confirms that you have abused multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 03:10, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.