User talk:გიორგი ჩუბინიძე

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, გიორგი ჩუბინიძე. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 09:38, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sergo Vardosanidze[edit]

The article Sergo Vardosanidze has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. John from Idegon (talk) 14:36, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Sergo Vardosanidze) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Sergo Vardosanidze, გიორგი ჩუბინიძე!

Wikipedia editor Chris troutman just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This article really needs independent sources!

To reply, leave a comment on Chris troutman's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rozeta Gujejiani[edit]

hi გიორგი ჩუბინიძე, Rozeta Gujejiani, that you created is up for deletion (not by me:)), thought you might like to know. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:37, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Rozeta Gujejiani, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:58, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Saint Andrew the First-Called Georgian University of the Patriarchate of Georgia[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Saint Andrew the First-Called Georgian University of the Patriarchate of Georgia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://en.sangu.edu.ge/index.php?lang=geo&page=384. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk) 19:16, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Abelmoschus Esculentus. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Nanuka Zhorjoliani, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus ^{talk / contribs} 07:42, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The surname of Nanuka Zhorzholiani is written indeed as Zhorzholiani. Her verified facebook page is a proof. I kindly ask you to help us to revise her surname where mentioned. Thank you in advance.--გიორგი ჩუბინიძე (talk) 09:38, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ვიკიორდენი თქვენთვის![edit]

	დამსახურებული ვიკიორდენი
	ქართულ ვიკიპედიაში სტატია სალომე ზურაბიშვილი მშვენივრად დაამუშავე ჯეო (talk) 17:11, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Giorgi Chubinidze moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Giorgi Chubinidze, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 15:15, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from writing about yourself and if you insist on doing so you must go through WP:AFC. Praxidicae (talk) 15:16, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020[edit]

Hello გიორგი ჩუბინიძე. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Gigi_Adamashvili, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:გიორგი ჩუბინიძე. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=გიორგი ჩუბინიძე|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. I'm also leaving you a notice about paid editing due to several of your creations such as the one above. Please read this policy and WP:COI. Praxidicae (talk) 15:18, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae:. Dear Praxidicae, thank you very much for your notice, but it is extremely unfair in my case. I am an active contributor to the Georgian Wikipedia since 2013, 7 July and I am familiar with basic policies of Wikipedia and Wikimedia Foundation. Never in my life I have taken a tetri for my edits. I assume that the only reason of this upsetting accusation is the fact that I edit article about contemporary Georgians, who represent Georgia’s modern culture. There is a huge lack in Wikipedia on the topic, and it just happens that my interest is mainly in contemporary artists and entertainers. I strongly assume that an interest in specific topic should not be banned.--გიორგი ჩუბინიძე (talk) 14:35, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No the problem is that you're writing promotional articles about various topics and you just happen to be the copyright owner of their professional photos? Please explain how you became the copyright holder of these files: [1][2][3][4][5]. Praxidicae (talk) 15:02, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:გიორგი ჩუბინიძე, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=გიორგი ჩუბინიძე|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. You still have not responded to my last request. Praxidicae (talk) 14:15, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae: Dear Praxidicae, as I have already mentioned there is absolutely no financial stake in my edits, and I really don't understand why you have this impression: I would be grateful if you could point out who exactly you think is paying for my edits. Regarding the pictures, I am not that much familiar with commons licensing - I tried to get familiar with it, but I it seems that I am still failing to get entirely familiar with all the commons guidelines. As for my employer, I work for the National Parliamentary Library of Georgia, and I strongly doubt that my employer is in any way interested in promotion of these articles.--გიორგი ჩუბინიძე (talk) 15:43, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020[edit]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Gigi Adamashvili, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 19:05, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ako Akhalaia moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Ako Akhalaia, does not have reliable sources as written to remain published. It needs substantial 3rd party reliable published sources, not blogs or postings or mere notices ). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 01:43, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ako Akhalaia (November 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ako Akhalaia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ako Akhalaia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 22:22, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, გიორგი ჩუბინიძე! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curbon7 (talk) 22:22, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Khashuri News moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Khashuri News, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 20:35, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ako Akhalaia (March 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sagotreespirit were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Essentially an ad. Take a look at WP:NOTLINKEDIN

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ako Akhalaia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ako Akhalaia, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Sagotreespirit (^talk) 16:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Giorgi Chubinidze[edit]

Hello, გიორგი ჩუბინიძე. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Giorgi Chubinidze, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Giorgi Chubinidze[edit]

Hello, გიორგი ჩუბინიძე. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Giorgi Chubinidze".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 17:24, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Khashuri News[edit]

Hello, გიორგი ჩუბინიძე. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Khashuri News, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:32, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Khashuri News[edit]

Hello, გიორგი ჩუბინიძე. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Khashuri News".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:00, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ako Akhalaia[edit]

Hello, გიორგი ჩუბინიძე. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ako Akhalaia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]