User talk:0xankit

Speedy deletion nomination of User:0xankit

A tag has been placed on User:0xankit requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 09:46, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... I'm a new user to wikipedia willing to contribute. First of all I can't see any reason for deleting my page. If it is based on contents for now i can archive the page and would add contents gradually and then publish. I felt there is need to add contents for wikipedia based on Blockchain, Cryptography, and new Projects coming up in near future. It would take some time to do research with valid references. Deleting the page would only stop me from sharing contents and improving wikipedia, and it also don't align with "Freedom of speech" that wikipedia offers. Do give me some time to improve the page. --0xankit (talk) 10:20, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You were writing about your employer which is an inherent conflict of interest. We have little interest in what your company wants to say about its products/services; such writing is considered to be promotional. Wikipedia content should be sourced to reliable, third-party sources that have no financial interest in the topic being discussed. If you wish to be an editor who contributes to subject areas unrelated to your conflict of interest, please follow the unblock instructions below. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:13, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Drm310 for clarifying about conflict of interest. I understand it now, and willing to not post something like that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 0xankit (talk • contribs)

You're welcome. Please also remember to sign your posts on talk pages. Thanks. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:00, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:59, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

0xankit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understood why i was blocked, and i have no intension to do that. I had no intension to do any kind of harm to any individual or any organisation. I can promise to refrain from posting any such promotional contents. 0xankit (talk) 06:03, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You will need to tell us what edits you intend to make instead. 331dot (talk) 07:37, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.