User talk:128.151.150.1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Waste container, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Waste container was changed by 128.151.150.1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.972924 on 2011-09-08T03:29:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:29, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Mississauga with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 01:18, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Closedmouth. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Dewatering because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Closedmouth (talk) 11:08, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Anaxial. Your recent edit to the page Joel Seligman appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Anaxial (talk) 00:39, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edit to List of University of Rochester people constitutes vandalism and has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 00:49, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Joel Seligman, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Donner60 (talk) 00:50, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013[edit]

Stop icon This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Stuff (cloth), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Reify-tech (talk) 18:31, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Oddbodz. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to U.S. News & World Report, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Oddbodz (talk) 23:49, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Will Middlebrooks. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Frosty (Talk page) I am from here I think 05:09, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alevi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • shiism or sufi-shia, Turkish: ''Alevîlik'') is a religious group combining [[Anatolian]] folk [[Sunni] with [[Sufism|Sufi]] elements such as those of the [[Bektashi Order|Bektashi]] ''[[tariqa]]'
  • —David Shankland<ref>''Structure and Function in Turkish Society.'' Isis Press, 2006, p. 81).</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:34, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Vieque. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Berard Haile because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Vieque (talkctb) 01:36, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Frosty. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Fanny Hill— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —Frosty 06:10, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jackson Halebian, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jackson Halebian, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jackson Halebian[edit]

Hello, 128.151.150.1. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Jackson Halebian".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Jackson Halebian}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:01, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Thoughtcrime, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. LjL (talk) 21:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Thoughtcrime. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. LjL (talk) 21:52, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tiernan VanDyke (March 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
/wiae /tlk 12:08, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! 128.151.150.1, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! /wiae /tlk 12:08, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016[edit]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. /wiae /tlk 12:08, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm FoCuSandLeArN. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Graphis caribica has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 01:52, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with this edit. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:54, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, you may be blocked from editing. Julietdeltalima (talk) 19:54, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2016[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Super 8 film. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 21:24, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Hamtechperson. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to John Forbes Nash Jr.— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hamtechperson 20:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Jenna Rose. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Jim1138 (talk) 01:08, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ritornello, you may be blocked from editing. Hamtechperson 01:22, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. JC7V-constructive zone 18:42, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2019[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Jc3s5h. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Taurus (astrology) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Jc3s5h (talk) 05:10, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Year 2000 problem. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Linguistical (talk) 22:27, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Punk subculture has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:25, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Chicago. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Everedux (talk) 02:02, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chicago, you may be blocked from editing. Egsan Bacon (talk) 02:20, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020[edit]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Xinjiang re-education camps‎, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 17:08, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]