User talk:175.103.25.178

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 175.103.25.178, is registered to Ibis Hotel Adelaide, South Australia and may be shared by multiple users using public terminals or a Wi-Fi hotspot, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock or Template:School block. Public terminals and Wi-Fi hotspots may have set expiry times (usually in 30- or 60-minute intervals); consider this in deciding a block duration. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation; network administrators may be able to disable access to the network by offenders.

Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

May 2017

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Angry Anderson— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 08:02, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:09, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mars Attacks!. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 13:24, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop being silly. I've only put a few good details. If you keep being disruptive I report you.

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Mars Attacks!.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 13:28, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

If you continue to disrupt my work, I can report you, block you.

July 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Qatar Airways, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 16:00, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Human rights in the United Arab Emirates. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 16:01, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I have added references to the Qatar airways page, as you requested ok? In the same way, you are requested to not be a jerk. If you are unfamiliar, here is something for you to read -> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_be_a_jerk . The information I added to the Human rights in the United Arab Emirates page is NOT personal commentary, because I have almost stated the same thing in the reference ( which is a newspaper in the UAE )

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Englishman in New York. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jetstreamer ^Talk 14:26, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, RMS Queen Mary 2, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:47, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Streak. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Marianna251TALK 23:59, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Steak, you may be blocked from editing. Marianna251TALK 00:18, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Telfordbuck (talk) 23:33, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

And give me an example of this vandalism. On the contrary, YOU are the vandal, as you havent provided any feedback. You just blindly revert.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Bronx-Lebanon Hospital Center. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Marianna251TALK 23:44, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Maybe fellow editors should stop calling me names too huh? But you conveniently ignored that.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for disruptive editing including adding unsourced material and unencyclopedic material. While some of your edits are meaningful contributions to Wikipedia, many of them are destructive ([1] [2] [3] [4] [5]). Your block will expire in 31 hours. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Malinaccier (talk) 00:07, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't called the edits to the 'Hampshire' article destructive.. Unless you want to make a mountain out of a mole hill and give me a bad name.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:26, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Erik Estrada. Magnolia677 (talk) 12:07, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2017

I've reset your block to one month hardblock for block evasion using 54.252.96.74.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 15:38, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017: vandalism, personal attacks, edit warring and using talk pages as forums

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Talk:Barcelona, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jeppiz (talk) 11:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Where is your proof that I am " using talk pages as forums " and " vandalizing "? If you do not have proof, don't you dare make accusations. Such behavior will be reported. Thank you.175.103.25.178 (talk) 11:10, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to oblige, here is a "good" example [6]. Jeppiz (talk) 13:38, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong. That is a " bad " example. And that is not personal attack. Go look up what that means. It means calling someone or their family bad names. By the way, someone called me a Weasel, but you failed to write a warning on his ( or her ) page. Whats the matter, biased? 175.103.25.178 (talk) 03:25, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Hello, I'm BeywheelzLetItRip. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Police car, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Only talk about police cars in this article. Some links are not related. Also, there is no such thing as prison vans. Thank you. —Bey WHEELZ ^Let It _RIP!✉📝^Sign 12:09, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Sorry, but there is a prison van article.. >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prisoner_transport_vehicle

Recent edits to List of individuals executed by the United States military

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of individuals executed by the United States military, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! L3X1 (distænt write) 16:30, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Your recent editing history at Ameera al-Taweel shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 15:52, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You are the one edit warring. Just because you are an Emir, does not mean you can revert Saudi articles.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ameera al-Taweel. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. UA3 (talk) 11:29, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Ameera al-Taweel, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 92.40.248.197 (talk) 09:30, 12 November 2017 (UTC)\[reply]

YOU stop vandalizing.. There are TWO good sources. Therefore it is not unsourced. Go ahead, block me. I will take this further. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.103.25.178 (talk • contribs)

I am not vandalising. It was you that I reported at WP:AIAV, not myself. You might want to read WP:NPA as well. 92.40.248.235 (talk) 10:21, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I know it is you who reported. But it still not vandalizing. You need to get the facts right >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism#What_is_not_vandalism

I already know what is and isn't vandalism. Please read WP:AGF 92.40.248.235 (talk) 11:00, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for Edit warring and violating the biographies of living persons policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:02, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:50, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rashid bin Mohammed Al Maktoum, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. UA3 (talk) 08:38, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Rashid bin Mohammed Al Maktoum

Hey, please note that I don't have anything against you, we want a better Wikipedia away from unreliable sources, I don't care what you add the pages, but the most important we need to make sure these things are needed, and if they are needed we need to make sure we have the right source. Thanks. UA3 (talk) 09:04, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, if you say so. The thing is, I get the same behavior from other Gulf editors. They don't like people ( including other Gulf editors ) to publish human rights related things. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.103.25.178 (talk • contribs) 14:04, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As long as it written from unbiased perspective I don't have an issue with that, having a neutral point of view is one of the main things here in Wikipedia. UA3 (talk) 16:23, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And that's the thing. The word ' unbiased ' can have many meanings . Many people from the Gulf are scared to listen or to see the jagged truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.103.25.178 (talk • contribs) 06:34, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

They're not scared, most people here are in denial that human rights violation exists, others are oblivious about this matter and think the western media are "jealous" and try to sabotage the country's reputation, the government work on ensuring that better work conditions are in place, but they need to work harder and impose harsher penalties on violating companies, especially companies owned by Sheikhs. UA3 (talk) 20:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not just Sheikhs. Sometimes the Sheikh tries to do good, but other people ( including some foreign owners ) show no regard for the law.

November 2017

BTW: it's spelled "the", not "teh"
Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, It's My Birthday, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 11:03, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Still laid up as of 2017"

By adding this sentence fragment in the "Status" field you are somehow seeing the "Status" as not being the current status. If not specified, would you expect that "Laid up in Philadelphia..." means it was there at some point?

By placing your fragment before the source cited, you are implying that the source (from 7 years ago) says it is laid up in 2017.

More to the point: When you boldly make a change and someone reverts your change, if you disagree, it is time to discuss the issue. Please see WP:BRD. Simply restoring your edit seldom resolves the issue. - SummerPhD^v2.0 13:00, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So what to do now? The fact is that it is STILL in the same port, same pier.

December 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Slob. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 13:40, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That was not the intention, now YOU stop being a vandal.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:45, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Comment for blocking administrator

Ad Orientem Could you please remove talk page access for this IP editor? They keep removing the active block notice you placed. Thanks. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 14:52, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently making disruptive edits. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:53, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

December 2018

Hello, I'm AnEditor1234. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tourist guy have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. AnEditor1234 (talk) 22:20, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Wrong. The entire section is unsourced. 175.103.25.178 (talk) 22:23, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at United Airlines Flight 175, you may be blocked from editing. Home Lander (talk) 22:39, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at United Airlines Flight 175. Home Lander (talk) 22:43, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Home Lander (talk) 22:52, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:22, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.