User talk:195.188.14.222

August 2016

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Irvine Royal Academy have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 11:35, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2019

Hello, I'm Horst Hof. I noticed that you recently removed content from Michelle Ballantyne without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Horst Hof (talk) 10:05, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Michelle Ballantyne, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 11:27, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Gillian Martin‎, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:57, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Lanark—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 12:47, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

March 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Forfar. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 15:55, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lanark, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 15:56, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Stenhousemuir. - Arjayay (talk) 15:58, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Hello, I'm ButterCashier. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, George Adam, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ButterCashier (talk) 12:21, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2023

Hello, I'm Plandu. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Jerry Springer—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Plandu (talk) 14:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 17:18, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

John Mason (Scottish politician)

Regarding the message you left on my Talk page, please see my reply here. Best wishes, Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 15:54, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

---